Demand Data Validation via Supply Imbalance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturers face challenges in accurately determining product demand due to time delays and inaccuracies in sales data, leading to revenue losses and skepticism in demand data validation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that generate supply-demand imbalance data by processing product demand and supply data, and validate demand data by comparing this imbalance with commerce data, using a validation engine to determine if the data accurately reflects market trends.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If manufacturers use actual dealer sales data to measure demand, then they can obtain demand information, but the data does not accurately represent buyer demand due to the white car problem and other distortions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of demand informationVSAvoidreliability of sales data as demand predictor
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation system that compares demand data against multiple independent data sources (sales data, supply data, market conditions) to filter out distortions. This intermediary layer acts as a mediator between raw sales data and final demand determination, eliminating the white car problem and other sales data distortions by cross-validating against alternative indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where demand data is continuously validated against actual market outcomes and supply responses. This feedback mechanism allows manufacturers to refine demand measurements over time by comparing predicted demand with actual market behavior, correcting errors in the demand data generation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If manufacturers increase the number of product configuration options, then they can better meet diverse customer needs, but determining demand for each configuration becomes increasingly difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct configuration varietyVSAvoidcomplexity of demand measurement system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex demand measurement problem into manageable components by validating demand data at multiple levels: aggregate product levels, configuration category levels, and individual option levels. This segmentation allows the system to handle diverse product configurations without being overwhelmed by the complexity of tracking every possible combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system is designed to be universal and multi-functional, working across different product types, configuration options, and data sources. This universal approach allows manufacturers to apply the same validation methodology regardless of the number or type of configuration options, simplifying the overall demand measurement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If manufacturers produce products based on expected demand data, then they can plan production, but they risk significant revenue loss if the demand data is inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction planning efficiencyVSAvoidrevenue loss from mismatched production
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by validating demand data before production decisions are made. The system performs comprehensive validation checks against multiple data sources and market indicators prior to finalizing production plans, ensuring that production is based on accurately validated demand data rather than unverified expectations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements preliminary anti-action by identifying and correcting errors in demand data before they can cause production mismatches. Through pre-validation against alternative data sources and market conditions, the system prevents the harmful effects of inaccurate demand data from manifesting in production decisions and subsequent revenue losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS10867306B1Product demand data validation
Publication Date: 2020.12.15 VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC
  • US10867306B1 patent drawing
  • US10867306B1 patent drawing
  • US10867306B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A validation engine validates product demand data using novel supply-demand imbalance data. Validating the product demand data provides confidence that the demand data is accurate. Confidence in the demand data allows manufacturers, distributors, and others involved in commerce to rely upon the demand data for product manufacture and ordering. The validation engine correlates determined product demand data with product supply data to generate ‘imbalance data’. The product supply data represents data for the same time period as the time period of the product demand data. The imbalance data is, in one embodiment, a difference between the product supply data and the product demand data. In one embodiment, the validation engine generates the imbalance data by subtracting product demand data from the supply data associated with the same product. Negative imbalance data indicates undersupplied products, and positive imbalance data indicates oversupplied products.