Demand-Driven Track Production for Mixed Product Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manufacturing systems are inefficient in producing diverse products on a single line, requiring multiple high-speed lines or significant downtime for changes, leading to high costs and inefficiencies in producing different types of products or container arrangements.

Innovation Solution

An automated track system with independently routable vehicles and unit operation stations that can produce various products based on demand, allowing for simultaneous production of different products on a single line without manual handling, using a control system to determine routes and optimize production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple high-speed manufacturing lines are employed to produce diverse products, then product diversity is improved, but cost and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct diversityVSAvoidcost and space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing line is designed as a universal system that can produce multiple different products through software configuration rather than requiring separate dedicated lines for each product type. The system uses reconfigurable robots and programmable controllers to adapt to different product requirements, allowing one line to serve multiple functions and produce diverse products cost-effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing line incorporates dynamic reconfiguration capabilities where robots, conveyors, and processing equipment can be programmatically adjusted to change production parameters, speeds, and configurations based on the specific product being manufactured. This dynamic adaptability eliminates the need for static dedicated lines for each product type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If production changes are made on a manufacturing line to produce different products, then product versatility is improved, but production downtime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct versatilityVSAvoidproduction downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-loads product specifications, robot paths, and processing parameters into memory before production changes are needed. When a product change is required, the system can quickly switch to pre-programmed configurations without requiring time-consuming manual reconfiguration or setup, thereby minimizing production downtime while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing line replaces manual mechanical reconfiguration with automated programmable control systems. Robots and equipment are controlled through software that can be rapidly updated to reflect new product requirements, eliminating the time-consuming manual adjustment of mechanical components and reducing changeover downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If high-speed container filling systems are reconfigured for different container types, then adaptability is improved, but changeover time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer type flexibilityVSAvoidchangeover time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The filling system uses programmable parameters that can be quickly adjusted to accommodate different container types, sizes, and filling requirements. Rather than physically reconfiguring the system for each container type, the control system modifies operational parameters such as filling speed, nozzle positioning, and carrier configuration through software, enabling rapid changeovers with minimal downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual handling is used for different container arrangements, then packaging flexibility is improved, but accuracy and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging flexibilityVSAvoidpacking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses automated robots and control systems that can independently handle different container arrangements without manual intervention. The robots are programmed to automatically adjust their movements and configurations to achieve precise packing arrangements, eliminating the inaccuracies and inefficiencies associated with manual handling while maintaining the flexibility to handle various container types and configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11698626B2System and method for producing products based upon demand
Publication Date: 2023.07.11 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • US11698626B2 patent drawing
  • US11698626B2 patent drawing
  • US11698626B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for producing products based upon demand are disclosed. In some cases, the products include containers and the contents therein. The containers are disposed on vehicles and are independently routable along a track system and are deliverable to at least one unit operation station. A control system: receives demand for finished products; determines a route for vehicles based upon the status of one or more unit operation stations; and causes a vehicle to progress along a determined route to create one or more of the demanded finished products. The system may be used to produce the same fluent products, different fluent products, and other types of products including assembled products.