Demand Parameter Estimation via Hierarchical Pool Blending

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing demand parameter estimation methods in retail science are imprecise due to pooling similar units together, leading to a tradeoff between reliability and richness, requiring complex calculations and large computational resources, thus limiting user base and practicality.

Innovation Solution

A computer system that automatically estimates demand parameters by blending estimates from small pools with those from enlarged pools using a blending parameter, obtained through two-fold cross validation, to achieve improved reliability with minimal sacrifice in richness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If many disparate units are pooled together to obtain demand parameter based on most possible data, then the quantity of data increases, but the measurement precision decreases due to lack of similarity among units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of dataVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data into hierarchical pools (e.g., product level, category level, store level) allowing different levels of aggregation. This enables the system to pool data at appropriate levels where units are sufficiently similar while still accessing large quantities of data from higher-level pools when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension to data pooling, moving from flat pooling of all units to multi-level pooling structure. This dimensional change allows the system to navigate between granularity (for precision) and volume (for quantity) by selecting appropriate levels in the hierarchy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If similar units are pooled together to improve measurement precision, then the measurement precision improves, but the quantity of data decreases and reliability becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges estimates from different pool levels through a blending mechanism. The blended estimate combines the precise estimate from similar units at lower levels with the reliable estimate from larger pools at higher levels, achieving both precision and reliability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite demand parameter estimate by blending components from different sources (different pools). This composite approach combines the strengths of both precise but small-sample estimates and reliable but less precise estimates from larger pools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Measurement precision

If complex calculations and simulation techniques are used to improve demand parameters, then the measurement precision improves, but the device complexity and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service through automated blending of estimates across hierarchical pools. The blending parameter is derived automatically from the data structure itself without requiring external simulation techniques or complex user intervention, reducing both complexity and computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical calculation systems (simulation, search techniques) with a simpler statistical blending approach. This substitution maintains measurement precision while dramatically reducing computational complexity and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8645188B2Automatic demand parameter estimation
Publication Date: 2014.02.04 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US8645188B2 patent drawing
  • US8645188B2 patent drawing
  • US8645188B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment is directed generally to a computer system, and in particular to a system for providing automatic estimating of demand parameters. According to certain embodiments, a computer readable medium has instructions stored thereon that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to determine a reliable demand parameter for a level within a sales hierarchy. The instructions include estimating a demand parameter for a first pool. The estimating is based on blending and comparing with respect to an enlarged pool comprising the first pool as a subset of the enlarged pool to obtain an estimated demand parameter.