Demand Profile Clustering for Inventory Replenishment Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturers and distributors face inefficiencies in determining optimal inventory levels and replenishment parameters for thousands of different parts, as demand for individual parts changes over time, leading to increased costs and potential stockouts.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning to optimize inventory parameters by profiling parts based on demand signatures, grouping similar parts, and calculating representative demand profiles to determine optimized inventory levels and replenishment triggers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional manual methods are used to determine inventory levels for thousands of parts, then individual part optimization is possible, but the process becomes highly inefficient and cannot keep up with changing demand

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory optimization efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inventory management processes with an automated machine learning system. The ML engine automatically profiles parts, groups them by demand characteristics, and determines optimal inventory parameters without human intervention, dramatically improving efficiency while handling thousands of parts simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service inventory optimization where the machine learning model autonomously continuously profiles parts, updates demand signatures, groups parts dynamically, and recalculates inventory parameters without external input, allowing the system to adapt automatically to changing demand patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of energy

If inventory levels are reduced to minimize costs, then inventory costs decrease, but the ability to fulfill orders on time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory costVSAvoidon-time delivery
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by determining optimal inventory levels for each part based on its specific demand characteristics and grouping. Instead of uniform inventory policies, the system tailors inventory parameters to each part's demand signature, ensuring cost-effective levels for low-demand parts while maintaining adequate stock for high-demand parts, thus reducing total inventory cost without compromising on-time delivery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes inventory parameters (optimal inventory levels, reorder points, safety stock) based on updated demand profiles and group characteristics. As demand patterns evolve, the ML model continuously adjusts these parameters to maintain the optimal balance between minimizing inventory costs and ensuring reliable on-time delivery performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If demand profiles are updated continuously to reflect changing demand, then inventory optimization accuracy improves, but the computational workload and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemand profile accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments parts into demand-based groups using machine learning clustering. By grouping parts with similar demand characteristics together, the system reduces the computational complexity of continuous updates - instead of individually processing thousands of parts, it updates group-level demand profiles and applies changes to multiple parts simultaneously, maintaining high accuracy while managing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-profiling parts and establishing initial demand signatures before full optimization is needed. This preliminary profiling creates a foundation that simplifies subsequent continuous updates, as the system only needs to refine existing profiles rather than create them from scratch, reducing ongoing computational workload

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12547956B2Systems and methods for use of a global registry with automated demand profiling via machine learning to optimize inventory management
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 DEMAND DRIVEN TECH INC
  • US12547956B2 patent drawing
  • US12547956B2 patent drawing
  • US12547956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inventory machine learning process can be applied iteratively. The inventory machine learning process can be applied by a computing device. The inventory machine learning process can include determining similarity scores between demand profiles for individual parts and group centers for similarity groups of parts. The inventory machine learning process can include assigning individual parts into the similarity groups using similarity scores. The inventory machine learning process can include calculating representative demand profiles for each similarity group and determining whether the representative demand profile meets a threshold. When the threshold is met, inventory parameters can be determined for each similarity group based on the inventory machine learning process.