Multi-Chamber Demining Facility with Shock Wave Deflectors
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing facilities for demining and investigating explosive devices are inadequate as they either scatter residues upon explosion, fail to collect significant components for analysis, or are limited in size and purpose, leading to environmental contamination and resource inefficiency.
Innovation Solution
A multi-staged facility with interconnected structures designed to suppress and collect the kinetic energy and residues of explosive devices, featuring polygonal chambers with shock wave deflectors, ventilation systems, and filtration, covered in composite materials to minimize environmental impact and enable thorough examination.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If a tubular-shaped reinforced concrete facility is used for mine clearance and investigation, then the structure provides basic containment, but upon explosion the residues and components are scattered over a large area and cannot be collected for investigation
Solution Approach 1:
The facility is divided into multiple functional chambers (demining chamber, investigation chamber, containment chamber) with segmented walls and floors. The wall system includes inner wall, insulation layer, and outer wall as separate segments. This segmentation allows residues to be contained within specific chambers while maintaining structural integrity during explosion.
Solution Approach 2:
An intermediate inspection chamber is introduced between the demining chamber and the external environment. This intermediary chamber captures and contains explosive residues that escape from the demining chamber, preventing them from scattering outside while allowing controlled transfer of components for investigation.
2Reliability
If special capsules or detonation chambers are used, then explosion containment is improved, but the dimensions are too small to accommodate explosive devices of unknown composition and size
Solution Approach 1:
The facility is divided into multiple functional chambers (demining chamber, investigation chamber, containment chamber) with segmented walls and floors. The wall system includes inner wall, insulation layer, and outer wall as separate segments. This segmentation allows residues to be contained within specific chambers while maintaining structural integrity during explosion.
Solution Approach 2:
The facility employs a nested chamber structure where the demining chamber is contained within the inspection chamber, which is in turn contained within the overall facility structure. The wall assembly itself is nested with inner wall, insulation layer, and outer wall. This nesting provides progressive containment zones that can accommodate large devices while maintaining explosion containment.
3Reliability
If detonation chambers are used for explosive device detonation, then explosion containment is achieved, but demining and exploration of unknown explosive devices cannot be performed
Solution Approach 1:
The facility is designed as a multi-functional system where the demining chamber enables safe detonation of devices, the inspection chamber allows examination and collection of residues, and the investigation chamber provides controlled environment for detailed analysis. This universal design replaces separate specialized facilities with one integrated multi-purpose facility.
4Ease of operation
If conventional facilities are used for explosive processing, then basic treatment operations can be performed, but residues scatter widely causing environmental contamination and heavy vibrations to surroundings
Solution Approach 1:
The explosion, normally a harmful uncontrolled event, is converted into a beneficial controlled process. The facility captures explosive energy within the demining chamber to safely detonate devices, then directs residues through controlled pathways into the inspection and investigation chambers. What would be harmful scattering is transformed into controlled residue collection and analysis opportunities.
Solution Approach 2:
An intermediate inspection chamber is introduced between the demining chamber and the external environment. This intermediary chamber captures and contains explosive residues that escape from the demining chamber, preventing them from scattering outside while allowing controlled transfer of components for investigation.
5Quantity of substance
If facilities are designed for storage of explosive substances, then storage capability is provided, but demining, investigation and testing functions are not available
Solution Approach 1:
The facility is designed as a multi-functional system where the demining chamber enables safe detonation of devices, the inspection chamber allows examination and collection of residues, and the investigation chamber provides controlled environment for detailed analysis. This universal design replaces separate specialized facilities with one integrated multi-purpose facility.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The facility ensures safe and thorough examination of explosive devices, minimizes environmental contamination, and optimizes resource usage by effectively collecting and analyzing explosive residues while damping sound and vibration impacts.
Implementation Method 1
the composite material which on a sudden and uncontrollable explosion of an explosive device, receives the kinetic pressure energy of the dynamic blast of its residues and the shock of the pieces of the ingredients, the vibrations and dampens the sound
Implementation Method 2
in the walls 12 of the first chamber 2 are made openings 6, connecting the first 2 and the second 3 chambers respectively; in the front of the openings 6 of the first chamber 2 are placed shock wave deflectors 13
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
Structure of a facility for demining, investigating and testing of an explosive device which comprises several structural elements connected to each other for processing an explosive device. The elements comprise a chamber for demining, investigation and testing, and for the initial suppression of the potential explosion shock wave and primary collection of the explosive residues, a chamber for secondary suppression and secondary collection of the explosion shock wave, a chamber for final suppression of the shock wave including filtration and the final collection of the explosive residue and the shock wave spreading space. The chambers have openings in front, where shock wave deflectors have been placed and behind the openings have been placed barrier walls. In the chamber walls and the ceiling have been placed cameras, lights, lighting tunnels and ventilation equipment. Between the chambers are automatic opening and closing doors, and the building is covered with a composite cover.