Democratic Information Classification System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing platforms for managing and retrieving information elements, such as media items, face difficulties in classification due to variability in tagging schemes, language issues, and lack of hierarchical organization, making search and organization time-consuming and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based method that employs a democratic process to classify and retrieve information elements, allowing users to decide on categories and their hierarchies, using centrally stored thesauri and dictionaries for translation and synonym management, enabling efficient filtering and statistical analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If users are allowed to edit and add tags locally, then classification precision is improved, but loss of information occurs because other users cannot access the additional information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification precisionVSAvoidinformation loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges local user tagging systems with a centralized server system. Users can add and edit tags locally, and these changes are then synchronized to the central server, making the improved classifications available to all users. This combining of distributed user intelligence with centralized storage resolves the information loss problem while preserving classification precision improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where user tagging actions are communicated back to the central server and other users. When a user improves a classification locally, this feedback is transmitted to the server, which then updates the master classification scheme, allowing all users to benefit from the improved precision without information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If a fixed hierarchical classification scheme is used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability deteriorates because users cannot create new categories

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidclassification adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic classification scheme where the hierarchical structure can evolve over time. Users can propose new categories and modify existing ones, and these changes are integrated into the system through democratic processes. This dynamic approach maintains relatively simple system architecture while enabling flexible adaptation to new classification needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system design allows the classification scheme to serve multiple functions: it provides a stable hierarchical structure for organization while simultaneously enabling user-driven evolution and customization. The same system infrastructure supports both the fixed hierarchical aspects and the flexible user-created categories, achieving multi-functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If democratic processes are used for classification decisions, then adaptability is improved, but productivity decreases due to time-consuming consensus building

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification adaptabilityVSAvoidclassification speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a democratic process that requires only a threshold level of agreement rather than full consensus. By requiring partial agreement (e.g., majority vote or supermajority) rather than unanimous consent, the system achieves sufficient adaptability while significantly reducing the time and effort required compared to complete consensus-building processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Adaptability or versatility

If variability in tagging schemes is allowed, then adaptability is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to inconsistent classifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetagging flexibilityVSAvoidclassification consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages tagging variability by dynamically adjusting classification parameters and standards based on user contributions and consensus. The system allows flexibility in tagging approaches while maintaining precision through parameter adjustments such as requiring majority agreement for new tags, standardizing tag formats, and evolving classification criteria based on collective user input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8768939B2Method for classifying information elements
Publication Date: 2014.07.01 JIME
  • US8768939B2 patent drawing
  • US8768939B2 patent drawing
  • US8768939B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for displaying on a user's device display and selecting categorized information elements, comprising: grouping said information elements into one or several categories among one or several groups of categories, displaying said categories together with a list of information elements of said categories, making said information elements selectable, wherein the selection of one information element initiates a computer code to carry out a process with said information element, wherein said categories are based on a predefined dictionary thesaurus.