Demographic Data Ethics Adjustment Engine

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional data processing systems lack consideration for data ethics rules relevant to different demographic groups, leading to potential harm and requiring costly reversals of operations to comply with regulations.

Innovation Solution

Implement a system that adjusts data processing decisions based on risk metrics associated with demographic groups, using a data ethics module to evaluate and adjust results to comply with applicable laws, regulations, or norms, thereby mitigating harm and optimizing resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional data processing systems make decisions without considering demographic-specific ethics rules, then processing speed and simplicity are improved, but compliance with regulations and avoidance of harm to demographic groups deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing speedVSAvoidcompliance with data ethics rules
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by determining applicable data ethics rules for different demographic groups before making data processing decisions. The automated data processing decision engine evaluates which ethics rules apply to each demographic group affected by a decision, and adjusts the decision accordingly to comply with those rules, preventing non-compliance rather than correcting it later

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the evaluation process by identifying and applying different data ethics rules to different demographic groups. Instead of treating all users uniformly, the system determines which specific demographic groups are affected by each data processing decision and applies the relevant ethics rules for each group, enabling targeted compliance while maintaining overall system efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If data processing decisions are made without demographic ethics consideration, then device complexity is reduced, but harm to demographic groups and need for operational reversals increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidharm to demographic groups
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The automated data processing decision engine acts as an intermediary between data processing operations and demographic groups. It determines applicable data ethics rules for each demographic group affected by a decision and adjusts decisions to comply with those rules, serving as a mediator that prevents harm without requiring complex manual intervention or system redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously evaluating which demographic groups are affected by data processing decisions and determining the applicable ethics rules for each group. This feedback loop enables the system to adjust decisions in real-time to comply with relevant ethics rules, preventing harm while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If traditional systems make data processing decisions without demographic ethics rules, then productivity is improved, but loss of resources due to costly reversals increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing productivityVSAvoidcomputational resources wasted on reversals
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary determination of applicable data ethics rules before executing data processing decisions. By identifying which demographic groups are affected and which ethics rules apply to each group in advance, the system avoids making decisions that would later require costly reversals, thereby preserving computational resources while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated evaluation process provides feedback on which demographic groups are affected by each data processing decision and what ethics rules apply. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adjust decisions proactively to comply with relevant rules, preventing wasted computational resources on incorrect decisions that would need to be reversed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10600067B2Demographic based adjustment of data processing decision results
Publication Date: 2020.03.24 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US10600067B2 patent drawing
  • US10600067B2 patent drawing
  • US10600067B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for iteratively adjusting data processing decision results in accordance with rules. In some implementations, the applied rules may be data ethics rules associated with particular demographic groups, such as users in a particular geographic location, users in a particular age range, and so forth. The rules may describe the manner in which data, such as data that describes or identifies individuals, is collected, stored, analyzed, applied, manipulated, and/or destroyed. The various stages of data handling may be described as a data supply chain, and a set of rules may apply to the handling of data at one or more stages of the data supply chain. The rules may enforce data privacy considerations and/or other types of constraints on data handling.