Dendritic Compounds in Dental Composites

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current dental materials lack optimal mechanical and rheological properties, particularly in terms of flexural strength and polymerization shrinkage, which are essential for effective dental composites.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating dendritic compounds with a polyurethane core and two shells, linked via hexamethylene diisocyanate and trimethylolpropane, and modified with hydroxy-bearing (meth)acrylates, such as 6-fold HEMA-modified hydroxyethyl methacrylate, to enhance mechanical and rheological properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional dental materials are used, then the material can be processed, but the flexural strength is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexural strengthVSAvoidmechanical property
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses dendritic compounds as additives in dental composite materials. These dendrimers with specific polyurethane structures (core and two shells linked via hexamethylene diisocyanate and trimethylolpropane) are incorporated into the composite to enhance flexural strength by more than 10 MPa, resolving the contradiction between processability and mechanical strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the chemical structure of the dendritic compounds by reacting the outer shell with (meth)acrylate groups, specifically creating 6-fold HEMA modified compounds. This structural parameter change enables the dendrimers to function as effective elasticizers and rheology improvers while significantly increasing flexural strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If dendritic compounds are added to improve mechanical properties, then flexural strength increases, but polymerization shrinkage may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexural strengthVSAvoidpolymerization shrinkage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully controls the concentration of dendritic compounds at 1-10% by weight (preferably 1-5%, very particularly preferably 1-3%). This parameter optimization ensures that the flexural strength increases by more than 10 MPa while the polymerization shrinkage remains favorably influenced, resolving the contradiction between strength enhancement and shrinkage control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If dendritic compounds are added to improve rheological properties, then viscosity decreases under shear stress, but transparency may be impaired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverheological propertyVSAvoidtransparency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the dendrimer concentration to 1-10% by weight (preferably 1-5%, very particularly preferably 1-3%). At these controlled concentrations, the dendrimers provide significant rheological improvement with viscosity decreasing under shear stress during modeling, while maintaining transparency by avoiding excessive additive concentrations that would scatter light

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The addition of these dendritic compounds significantly increases flexural strength by over 10 MPa and improves rheological properties by reducing viscosity under shear stress without compromising transparency, making them suitable for dental filling composites.

Implementation Method 1

the viscosity of the paste decreases under shear stress, i.e. during modelling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear thinning: Shear Thinning

Implementation Method 2

The polyurethane structure (core, first and second shell) is preferably formed by the known reaction of diisocyanates with trihydric or polyhydric alcohols

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentEP1714633B1Dental materials comprising dendritic compounds
Publication Date: 2009.03.04 HERAEUS KULZER GMBH
  • EP1714633B1 patent drawing
  • EP1714633B1 patent drawing
  • EP1714633B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Dental material comprises at least a dendritic compound from a kernel and two bowls (where the kernel, first and second shell are connected together over a polyurethane group; and the second shell is modified by reacting with (meth)acrylate).