Dengue Virus T Cell Epitope Vaccine Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Developing an effective vaccine against dengue virus (DENV) is challenging due to the virus's four serotypes and the immune response's contribution to severe disease, particularly during secondary infections, where serotype cross-reactive antibodies can enhance infection and T cells may play a dual role in pathogenesis and protection, making it difficult to study their contribution.

Innovation Solution

Identification of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes from DENV structural and non-structural proteins, which can be used to elicit specific immune responses, and administration of peptides derived from these epitopes to induce protective T cell responses, as demonstrated in mouse models and human donors, providing protection against DENV infection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a vaccine is designed to protect against all four DENV serotypes, then broad protection is achieved, but the risk of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) increases during secondary infections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebroad protection against all four serotypesVSAvoidantibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The vaccine is segmented into multiple components targeting different serotypes and immune responses. It includes T cell epitopes from all four serotypes to elicit cross-protective T cell responses, while antibody components are designed to target conserved epitopes that minimize ADE risk. This segmentation allows broad protection while reducing harmful cross-reactivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the vaccine elicit different types of immune responses. T cell epitopes are selected to induce protective cellular immunity across all serotypes, while antibody-inducing regions are carefully chosen to avoid enhancing infection. The vaccine creates localized immune responses with different qualities (cellular vs. humoral) to balance protection and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If T cell responses are enhanced to provide protection, then viral clearance is improved, but the dual role of T cells in pathogenesis and protection makes the outcome unpredictable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective effect against DENVVSAvoiddual role of T cells in pathogenesis and protection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vaccine pre-activates protective T cell responses before natural infection occurs. By exposing the immune system to engineered T cell epitopes in advance, the vaccine establishes a primed, protective T cell repertoire that will respond effectively upon encounter with actual virus, preventing the unpredictable dual role scenario by establishing protective responses first.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The vaccine uses engineered peptide epitopes as intermediaries to bridge the gap between vaccine administration and protective immunity. These selected T cell epitopes act as mediators that specifically activate protective T cell pathways while avoiding those that contribute to pathogenesis, simplifying the complex T cell response dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If serotype cross-reactive antibodies are produced, then immunity to multiple serotypes is achieved, but enhancement of infection in FcγR+ cells occurs during secondary infection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmunity to multiple serotypesVSAvoidenhanced infection of FcγR+ cells
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful capability of cross-reactive antibodies to enhance infection is extracted and removed from the vaccine design. Instead of relying on traditional whole-virus or subunit vaccines that generate broad cross-reactive antibodies (some of which enhance infection), the vaccine extracts only the beneficial T cell epitopes that provide cross-protection without the harmful antibody-mediated enhancement effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The vaccine converts the potential harm of cross-reactivity into benefit by focusing on T cell cross-reactivity rather than antibody cross-reactivity. T cell epitopes from all four serotypes are included to generate cross-protective cellular immunity, which provides broad protection without the harmful FcγR-mediated enhancement that plagues antibody-based cross-reactive responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS10308689B2Dengue virus (DV) polypeptide sequences, T cell epitopes and methods and uses thereof
Publication Date: 2019.06.04 LA JOLLA INST FOR ALLERGY & IMMUNOLOGY
  • US10308689B2 patent drawing
  • US10308689B2 patent drawing
  • US10308689B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Dengue virus (DV) peptides, including T cell epitopes, structural and non-structural (NS) polypeptide sequences, subsequences and modifications thereof, nucleotide sequences encoding such peptides, and compositions including such peptides and encoding nucleotide sequences, and cells expressing such peptides, are provided. Such DV peptides, nucleotide sequences and compositions, can be used to elicit, stimulate, induce, promote, increase, enhance or activate an anti-DV CD8+ T cell response or an anti-DV CD4+ T cell response. Such peptides, nucleotide sequences and compositions can also be used for and in methods of vaccination/immunization of a subject against Dengue virus (DV) (e.g., to provide protection against DV infection and/or pathology), and for treatment of a subject in need thereof, for example, treatment of the subject for a Dengue virus (DV) infection or pathology.