Flue Gas Denitrizer Catalyst Arrangement for Degradation Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flue gas denitrizers face challenges in maintaining long-term continuous operation due to the deterioration of catalyst performance and function, leading to frequent replacements and reduced efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A catalyst arrangement deciding method that investigates the location-dependent degradation of catalysts in the flue gas denitrizer's catalyst layer, deciding on specific regions for different types of catalysts (e.g., plate-shaped and honeycomb catalysts) to optimize their placement and reduce degradation, thereby extending the denitrizer's operational lifespan.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the same type of catalyst is used throughout the catalyst layer, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the catalyst performance deteriorates uniformly across the layer leading to frequent replacements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst layer structureVSAvoidflue gas denitrizer continuous operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by dividing the catalyst layer into multiple regions (first region, second region, third region) along the exhaust gas flow direction, with each region containing a different type of catalyst (first catalyst, second catalyst, third catalyst). This allows each region to be optimized for its specific operational conditions, with upstream regions using catalysts resistant to ash deposition and downstream regions using catalysts optimized for denitration efficiency, thereby extending overall system reliability and continuous operation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If catalyst replacement is performed frequently to maintain performance, then the denitrizer effectiveness is maintained, but the operational lifespan and continuity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedenitrizer performanceVSAvoidflue gas denitrizer operational lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the catalyst layer into multiple distinct regions with different catalyst types arranged in sequence along the exhaust gas flow direction. This segmentation allows each catalyst type to address specific degradation mechanisms at different positions, with the first catalyst region resisting ash deposition, the second catalyst region maintaining intermediate performance, and the third catalyst region optimizing downstream denitration, thereby extending the overall operational lifespan without frequent replacements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If a single catalyst type is used in the catalyst layer, then the device complexity is low, but location-dependent degradation occurs leading to performance loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst arrangementVSAvoidcatalyst performance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by assigning different catalyst types to different spatial regions within the catalyst layer. The first catalyst is placed in the first region where ash deposition is most severe, the second catalyst in the second region with moderate conditions, and the third catalyst in the third region downstream. This location-specific catalyst assignment ensures each region's performance requirements are met, maintaining overall reliability while managing device complexity through systematic arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for the continuous use of flue gas denitrizers for a longer term by strategically placing more durable and high-performance catalysts in specific regions, reducing wear, ash deposition, and performance reduction, thus maintaining the denitrizer's effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

Nitrogen oxides (NOx) contained in exhaust gas from combustion facilities such as power generation boilers, gas turbines, and combustion furnaces may be removed or reduced by decomposing them into harmless nitrogen and water using a reductant in the presence of a denitration catalyst.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS11660570B2Catalyst arrangement deciding method for flue gas denitrizer, maintenance method for flue gas denitrizer, flue gas denitrizer, boiler, and power generation plant
Publication Date: 2023.05.30 MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD
  • US11660570B2 patent drawing
  • US11660570B2 patent drawing
  • US11660570B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A catalyst arrangement deciding method for a flue gas denitrizer including a catalyst layer disposed in an exhaust gas passage includes: a step of investigating a location dependence of a degradation state of a catalyst in the catalyst layer after a lapse of a period of operation; and a step of deciding a first region of the catalyst layer in which a first catalyst is used and a second region of the catalyst layer in which a second catalyst different from the first catalyst is used, on the basis of the location dependence.