Abrasive Grain Jet Grinding Device with Dense Blade Impeller

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing abrasive grain jet grinding devices fail to eject abrasive grains in a densely aggregated state, leading to inefficient polishing due to wide blade spacing on the impeller, resulting in scattered ejection and low polishing quality.

Innovation Solution

The device features an impeller with densely arranged, overlapping blades and flow-straightening blades that form numerous storage chambers for abrasive grains, combined with a nozzle having a triangular cross-sectional shape to ensure continuous and dense ejection of abrasive grains as a cluster, enhancing polishing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If wide spacing between blades on the impeller is used, then the device structure is simpler and easier to manufacture, but the abrasive grains are ejected intermittently and scattered, resulting in poor polishing quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolishing qualityVSAvoidblade arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The impeller blades are divided into multiple segments with narrow spacing, creating numerous storage chambers around the circumferential surface. This segmentation allows abrasive grains to be stored and ejected continuously in dense clusters, improving polishing quality while managing structural complexity through systematic division

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds the dimension of storage chambers formed by the narrow blade spacing, transforming the ejection process from intermittent (single dimension of rotation) to continuous (adding the dimension of multiple storage zones). This enables dense abrasive grain clusters to be maintained throughout the rotation cycle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If equally spaced blades on the impeller are used, then the device structure is simpler, but the abrasive grains are not densely aggregated, causing repulsion and bouncing instead of effective grinding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface smoothnessVSAvoidblade density and arrangement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blades are arranged with locally optimized narrow spacing to create storage chambers that maintain dense abrasive grain aggregation. This local quality enhancement ensures that abrasive grains remain closely aggregated in specific zones, preventing repulsion and bouncing while achieving effective surface grinding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The storage chambers formed by densely spaced blades preliminarily aggregate abrasive grains before ejection. This preliminary aggregation ensures that grains are already densely clustered when ejected, eliminating the need for post-ejection aggregation and preventing repulsion on impact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the number of storage chambers and open slits is increased, then continuous and dense ejection of abrasive grains is achieved, but the impeller structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolishing efficiencyVSAvoidimpeller structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The impeller is segmented into numerous blades with narrow spacing, creating multiple storage chambers and open slits around the circumferential surface. This segmentation increases the number of ejection points, enabling continuous abrasive grain delivery and improving polishing efficiency while distributing structural complexity across multiple identical elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The increased number of storage chambers and open slits ensures continuous ejection of abrasive grains throughout the impeller rotation. This continuity eliminates idle periods between grain clusters, maintaining constant polishing action and maximizing productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration results in a smooth and glossy workpiece surface by ensuring continuous and dense ejection of abrasive grains, improving polishing efficiency and quality by minimizing dull portions.

Implementation Method 1

an impeller that includes blades held between a shaft-side disk rotatable by a drive shaft and an open disk having an opening at a center thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

grind and polish the surface of a workpiece by spraying abrasive grains onto the workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS9902041B2Abrasive grain jet grinding device
Publication Date: 2018.02.27 KAMEI TEKKOUSHO
  • US9902041B2 patent drawing
  • US9902041B2 patent drawing
  • US9902041B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An abrasive grain jet grinding device having a belt partially wrapped around an impeller with blades between a shaft-side disc and an open disc and an open peripheral surface between the blades, a nozzle tangential to the disk at the point of separation between the belt and the peripheral surface, wherein the blades held between the shaft-side disc and the open disc are formed from thin plates to finely partition the circumference of the discs, are inclined forward in the direction of rotation of the discs, are provided densely so that multiple adjacent blades overlap each other, and are set with narrow gaps between the blades to form a large number of storage chambers for the abrasive grains.