Object And Relationship Detection With Density-Aware Joint Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image analysis methods separately optimize object detection and relationship prediction, preventing effective cross-learning and co-adaptation between the two domains, leading to suboptimal performance in scene understanding tasks.

Innovation Solution

A joint training approach for object detection and relationship prediction models using a keypoint-based model with a shared backbone layer, enabling fully-differentiable operations and a combined loss function that weights training based on object density and prediction confidence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If separate optimization is used for object detection and relationship prediction, then each model can be trained independently, but the two models cannot co-adapt each other to maximize performance and information from the relationship model does not flow to detection

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIndependent training capabilityVSAvoidPerformance optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges object detection and relationship prediction into a single unified model architecture where both tasks share common components (backbone network, feature extraction layers). This allows joint training where gradients from both detection loss and relationship loss flow through shared parameters, enabling the models to co-adapt and maximize performance simultaneously while maintaining independent training capability through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If two-stage approach is used for object detection, then object detection can be performed in separate stages, but model parameters cannot be effectively propagated through the models for joint training

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveStage-separated processingVSAvoidParameter propagation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the model into distinct functional components (backbone network, detection head, relationship prediction head) that can be trained independently in separate stages, yet maintains continuous differentiable paths for gradient flow. This segmentation allows flexible training strategies where stages can be trained sequentially or jointly, while preserving full parameter propagation capability through the use of shared features and differentiable operations throughout the architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12462525B2Co-learning object and relationship detection with density aware loss
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK
  • US12462525B2 patent drawing
  • US12462525B2 patent drawing
  • US12462525B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An object detection model and relationship prediction model are jointly trained with parameters that may be updated through a joint backbone. The offset detection model predicts object locations based on keypoint detection, such as a heatmap local peak, enabling disambiguation of objects. The relationship prediction model may predict a relationship between detected objects and be trained with a joint loss with the object detection model. The loss may include terms for object connectedness and model confidence, enabling training to focus first on highly-connected objects and later on lower-confidence items.