Density-Responsive Inflow Control for Water Choking in Horizontal Wells

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional inflow control devices are inadequate in choking back unwanted fluids in horizontal wells, particularly when viscosity contrasts between wanted and unwanted fluids are minimal, leading to reduced oil recovery and potential well abandonment.

Innovation Solution

The use of autonomous inflow control devices with rotatable discs that shift based on fluid density, aligning openings for desired fluids and misaligning them for undesirable fluids, thereby controlling fluid inflow based on density differences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional inflow control devices are used, then the device structure is simple, but the device is inadequate in choking back unwanted fluids when viscosity contrasts are minimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to choke back unwanted fluidsVSAvoidperformance across different fluid viscosity conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from viscosity-based to density-based discrimination. The autonomous inflow control device uses density differences between wanted and unwanted fluids to activate closure mechanisms, rather than relying on viscosity contrasts. This allows the device to effectively choke back unwanted fluids even when viscosity contrasts are minimal, directly resolving the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Extent of automation

If autonomous inflow control devices based on viscosity contrast are used, then the device can autonomously adjust, but the device provides poor performance in distinguishing fluids with comparable viscosities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous fluid discrimination capabilityVSAvoidfluid discrimination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from viscosity-based autonomous control to density-based autonomous control. The device autonomously discriminates fluids by detecting density differences through closure element activation, maintaining high automation while significantly improving reliability for fluids with comparable viscosities such as ultra-light oil and water.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If existing autonomous inflow control devices are used, then the device can choke back unwanted fluids, but the device is bulky with excessive moving parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunwanted fluid choking capabilityVSAvoidnumber of moving parts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates unnecessary moving parts from existing autonomous inflow control devices. The design uses a streamlined closure mechanism with reduced moving components while maintaining effective unwanted fluid choking capability through density-based activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes phase transition or state change concepts in the closure mechanism activation. The closure elements respond to density differences by transitioning between open and closed states, achieving effective fluid control with minimal moving parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively separates and restricts the inflow of unwanted fluids while allowing desired fluids to flow freely, enhancing oil recovery and preventing well abandonment.

Implementation Method 1

The autonomous inflow control device utilizes a plurality of rotatable discs which automatically shift in their relative positions based on the density of fluid in the autonomous inflow control device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDensity difference: Density Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP4337845B1Autonomous inflow control device system and method
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 SERVICES PETROLIERS SCHLUMBERGER SA
  • EP4337845B1 patent drawingFigure 1~5
  • EP4337845B1 patent drawingFigure 6~8
  • EP4337845B1 patent drawingFigure 9~10

AI summary

A technique facilitates the inflow of desired fluids into a downhole well completion while restricting the inflow of undesirable fluids. The technique utilizes at least one autonomous inflow control device which is placed along a well completion to control inflow of fluid from an exterior to an interior of the well completion. The autonomous inflow control device utilizes a plurality of shiftable elements which automatically shift in their relative positions based on the density of fluid in the autonomous inflow control device. This automatic shifting causes the alignment or misalignment of flow openings so as to allow free flow of a desired fluid through the autonomous inflow control device and into the interior of the completion while automatically restricting flow of an undesirable fluid.