3D Printed Dental Anatomical Replicas for Remote Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current dental training methods lack replicable, anatomically realistic models, leading to risks for patients and high costs due to the need for practicing on human subjects, which is exclusive and expensive, and does not allow for widespread skill acquisition.

Innovation Solution

The use of multi-ink 3D printing to create anatomically accurate replicas of human jaw and tooth structures, allowing for simulated training environments that include soft tissues, bone, and root structures, enabling repeated practice and remote training.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dental students practice on human patients to learn surgical procedures, then they gain real clinical experience, but patient safety is compromised and training costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient safetyVSAvoidtraining scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates photorealistic 3D printed replicas of human jawbones, teeth, and soft tissues that accurately replicate anatomical structures and surgical characteristics. These copies allow students to practice procedures repeatedly without risking patient safety, while maintaining realistic tactile feedback and visual appearance. The replicas include accurate bone density, tissue resistance, and anatomical variations to provide authentic training experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The training system incorporates adjustable parameters including progressive difficulty levels, varying tissue densities, and customizable anatomical variations. The soft tissue replicas can be configured with different firmness levels to simulate various tissue types, and the bone structures can be adjusted to represent different densities and anatomical configurations, allowing adaptation to different skill levels and clinical scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If dental students practice on human patients under preceptor oversight, then they receive personalized guidance, but training becomes expensive and exclusive to limited professionals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining accessibilityVSAvoidfeedback quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple feedback mechanisms including force sensors that measure applied pressure during procedures, motion tracking that monitors surgical technique, and visual comparison systems that allow students to immediately compare their work against ideal outcomes. The system provides real-time guidance through haptic feedback and visual overlays, enabling self-correction without constant preceptor intervention while maintaining high-quality feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The training system enables students to independently assess their own performance through built-in evaluation tools, including automated scoring of procedural accuracy, comparison with expert demonstrations, and generation of performance reports. This self-assessment capability allows students to continue practicing and improving without requiring constant preceptor availability, making training more accessible while maintaining quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional molded plastic training models are used, then training can be standardized, but anatomical realism and procedural authenticity are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanatomical accuracyVSAvoidproduction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the complex jaw structure into separable modules including individual teeth, bone segments, and soft tissue layers. Each module can be independently printed with high precision using appropriate materials, then assembled to create complete anatomical replicas. This segmentation allows for manufacturing complexity to be managed while maintaining high anatomical accuracy in each component, and enables customization of specific anatomical features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The training system employs multiple materials with different physical properties to replicate various anatomical tissues. Hard materials simulate bone density and resistance, softer materials replicate gingival and muscular tissues, and specialized materials provide appropriate tactile feedback for different surgical instruments. This composite approach achieves anatomical realism while allowing each material to be optimized for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces patient risk, lowers training costs, and enables a larger number of clinicians to acquire skills, making dental procedures more accessible and affordable by providing a standardized, repeatable, and realistic training experience.

Implementation Method 1

A training device made according to this invention is useful for remote and hands-on training in a variety of dental practice areas. 3D printing is used to replicate whole sections of a patient's jaw

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effect3D Printing: 3D Printing

Data Source

PatentUS11605310B2Anatomic apparatus and training system for remote and interactive hands-on surgical training for dentists
Publication Date: 2023.03.14 DENTAL EDUCATION LAB INC
  • US11605310B2 patent drawing
  • US11605310B2 patent drawing
  • US11605310B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A training system for dental procedures having a training device and a self-assessment for use with the training device is described. The training device is printed with a 3D printer and includes a predetermined anatomic form of at least a portion of a human jaw structure and a predetermined anatomic form of at least one human tooth structure. Part of the printed human tooth structure is rooted in the printed human jaw structure, and both structures are designed to have at least one analogous physical property to their corresponding human structures. The self-assessment includes a pictorial array of procedural outcomes of a procedural step so that a user can identify which image in the pictorial array best represents the user's own procedural outcome of the procedural step performed by the user on the training device and at least one feedback instruction.