Iterative 3D Volume Reconstruction for Dental CT

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mechanical inaccuracies in CT tomography apparatuses lead to deviations in scan geometry, resulting in errors and artefacts in reconstructed 3D volumes, making diagnosis challenging and potentially incorrect, and existing methods only partially improve reconstruction quality by minimizing entropy with limited parameter adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A method that simulates projection images based on varying parameters, compares them with recorded images to minimize re-projection errors, and iteratively optimizes the 3D volume reconstruction by adjusting these parameters, allowing for better optimization of the scan geometry and radiation interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional CT reconstruction methods are used, then the reconstruction process is fast and simple, but mechanical inaccuracies cause deviations in scan geometry resulting in errors and artefacts in the reconstructed 3D volume

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconstruction accuracyVSAvoidreconstruction method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an iterative feedback mechanism where the reconstructed 3D volume is repeatedly refined by comparing simulated projections with actual measured projections. The reconstruction process uses the current estimate of the 3D volume to generate simulated projections, compares these with actual measurements, and updates the reconstruction to minimize the difference. This feedback loop continues until convergence, thereby compensating for mechanical inaccuracies and improving reconstruction accuracy without requiring complex manual calibration procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The reconstruction method performs self-calibration by automatically adjusting for geometric deviations through the iterative optimization process. Instead of requiring external calibration procedures or manual intervention, the system uses the projection data itself to identify and correct geometric errors. The algorithm autonomously refines the 3D volume reconstruction by minimizing the re-projection error, thereby making the reconstruction process self-correcting and reducing artefacts caused by mechanical inaccuracies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If entropy minimization is used to improve reconstruction quality, then some improvement is achieved with limited parameter adjustments, but the method is not generally guaranteed to produce better reconstructions and is limited in scope

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconstruction qualityVSAvoidparameter optimization scope
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs comprehensive parameter optimization by systematically varying multiple geometric parameters including source position, detector position, rotation angles, and scan trajectory parameters. The iterative reconstruction process tests different parameter combinations and selects those that minimize the re-projection error between simulated and actual projections. This broad parameter search space allows the method to adapt to various types of mechanical inaccuracies and geometric deviations, providing versatile improvement across different scan conditions and apparatus configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly improves the quality of 3D volume reconstruction by directly optimizing scan geometry and radiation interactions, reducing errors and artefacts, and enabling automatic calibration and quality control, thus enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

Computed tomography (CT) is a digital 3D imaging method using penetrating radiation in particular X-ray radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray radiation: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

a tomography apparatus comprising a movable radiation source and a movable radiation detector is used. By moving the radiation source and the radiation detector along a generally circular scan trajectory around the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical motion:

Implementation Method 3

The 3D volume, more precisely the localized radiation attenuation caused by object structures in the inspected volume, is then reconstructed with different mathematical CT reconstruction methods

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTomographic reconstruction: Tomography

Implementation Method 4

generation of simulated projection images corresponding to at least a subset of the recorded projection images by simulating a projection of the penetrating radiation through the reconstructed 3D volume taking into account said given value of the at least one parameter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForward projection simulation:

Data Source

PatentUS9135729B2Method and tomography apparatus for reconstruction of a 3D volume
Publication Date: 2015.09.15 DURR DENTAL GMBH & CO KG
  • US9135729B2 patent drawing
  • US9135729B2 patent drawing
  • US9135729B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for reconstruction of a 3D volume from a set of projection images recorded by a tomography apparatus using penetrating radiation in the field of dental medical applications takes into account a given value of at least one parameter. Simulated projection images are generated which correspond to at least a subset of the recorded projection images by simulating a projection of the penetrating radiation through the reconstructed 3D volume taking into account said given value of the at least one parameter. A re-projection error is determined by comparing the simulated projection images (with the corresponding recorded projection images. The re-projection error is then minimized by changing the value of the at least one parameter and by iterating over the above steps.