Dental Handpiece Load-Responsive Motor Speed Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional dental motor-driven tools lack responsive speed control under varying loads, requiring practitioners to manually adjust foot pedals for speed regulation, which can lead to inefficiencies and increased risk of spatter during procedures.

Innovation Solution

A motor-driven dental handpiece with a microprocessor-controlled speed regulation system that adjusts motor speed in response to torsional load, using a PID loop and hysteresis current threshold to maintain optimal speed without the need for a foot pedal, allowing for seamless speed adjustment based on load conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional foot pedal speed control is used, then speed regulation is possible, but device complexity increases and ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor control system automatically adjusts speed based on load conditions without requiring manual foot pedal input. The microprocessor monitors motor current and adjusts PWM duty cycle to maintain optimal speed, making the system self-regulating and eliminating the need for external speed control devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors motor current as a proxy for load conditions and uses this feedback to automatically adjust motor speed. The microprocessor reads current sensor data and modifies PWM output accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that responds dynamically to changing loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If constant speed regulation is implemented, then speed stability improves, but adaptability to varying load conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidspeed stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The motor speed is made dynamic rather than fixed. The system adjusts speed in real-time based on detected load conditions, transitioning between different operational states (low speed for light load, high speed for heavy load) to optimize performance across varying work conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system changes the motor operating parameters (speed, power) based on detected load conditions. By monitoring motor current and adjusting PWM duty cycle, the system dynamically modifies electrical and mechanical parameters to adapt to changing operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If manual foot pedal adjustment is required, then speed control capability exists, but productivity decreases due to practitioner distraction

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The motor control system operates autonomously, monitoring load conditions and adjusting speed without requiring practitioner intervention. This self-regulating capability frees the practitioner to focus entirely on the dental procedure, improving both productivity and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses automatic feedback control where the microprocessor continuously monitors motor current and adjusts speed accordingly. This eliminates the need for manual foot pedal adjustment, allowing the practitioner to maintain full attention on patient care while the system handles speed regulation automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances user experience by eliminating the need for foot pedals, reducing spatter, and providing more precise control over motor speed, making the device simpler, safer, and longer-lasting, while minimizing battery drain and wear-and-tear.

Implementation Method 1

A Proportional-Integral-Derivative speed (PID) control loop maintains motor speed, by increasing the current to the motor windings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The motor control is responsive to a load placed upon the motor through the tool, such as by touching the tool to a surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistance: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 3

The motor control method, through the use of preset time delay and hysteresis threshold values to provide a desired user experience

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHysteresis: Hysteresis

Data Source

PatentUS11857384B2Dental device with load-responsive motor control
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 DENTSPLY SIRONA INC
  • US11857384B2 patent drawing
  • US11857384B2 patent drawing
  • US11857384B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motor-driven dental device has a motor control that is responsive to a load placed upon the motor. More specifically, the invention relates to a dental device having motor that drives a tool, wherein the tool is activated or otherwise controlled in response to a load placed upon the motor through the tool, such as by touching the tool to a surface. The tool may also be controlled by the sustenance, over a predetermined time period, of an increase or decrease in motor current beyond a predetermined hysteresis current threshold. The motor may be an electric motor, a rotary electric motor, and air driven motor, an ultrasonic device or the like.