Dental Machining Unit Force Sensor Placement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dental machining apparatuses face inaccuracy in measuring machining forces due to a time delay between force changes and current changes, leading to dead time and inaccuracy in measurement processes.

Innovation Solution

A force sensor is positioned between the tool spindle and the bearing housing to directly detect machining forces, using strain-gage elements or piezo elements, ensuring no relative movement and accounting for sensor-side deformations, allowing for independent detection of cutting forces from motor-driven spindle and current uptake.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machining force is determined indirectly via motor current uptake, then the measurement system remains simple, but measurement accuracy deteriorates due to dead time between force changes and current changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining force measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A force sensor is introduced as an intermediary element between the tool spindle and bearing housing to directly measure machining forces. This mediator provides accurate force data without requiring complex motor current analysis, eliminating the dead time problem while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The indirect electrical measurement method (motor current uptake) is replaced with a direct mechanical measurement approach using a force sensor. This substitution eliminates the time delay inherent in electrical response while providing immediate force data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If a force sensor is introduced to directly measure machining forces, then measurement accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting force detection accuracyVSAvoidspindle assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The force sensor is merged with the bearing housing structure, integrating the measurement function into the existing support structure. This combination eliminates the need for separate mounting components and reduces overall device complexity while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The bearing housing serves dual functions: supporting the tool spindle mechanically and housing the force sensor for measurement. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed, thereby simplifying the overall device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the force sensor is rigidly connected to prevent relative movements, then measurement stability improves, but sensor deformation from elasticities increases measurement error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce sensor positioning stabilityVSAvoidforce measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The connection characteristics are optimized by adjusting geometric parameters of the bracing members (thickness, length, material properties) to achieve the ideal balance between stability and minimal deformation. This parameter optimization ensures rigid enough connection for stability while flexible enough to minimize measurement error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The bracing members are designed with specific local properties (varying cross-sections, strategic thickness variations) to distribute stresses appropriately and minimize deformation at the sensor location while maintaining overall connection stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This setup enables precise detection of all machining forces transmitted to the spindle holder, providing accurate cutting force measurement independent of motor current, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of dental machining processes.

Implementation Method 1

the force sensor has at least one sensor element in the form of a measuring bridge or a piezo element, in which case the measuring bridge is designed using thick film technology or as a strain-gage element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain-gage effect: Piezoresistive Effect

Implementation Method 2

the force sensor has at least one sensor element in the form of a measuring bridge or a piezo element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8845197B2Dental machining unit with tool spindle
Publication Date: 2014.09.30 SIRONA DENTAL SYSTEMS GMBH CORP LEGAL
  • US8845197B2 patent drawing
  • US8845197B2 patent drawing
  • US8845197B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to dental machining apparatus (1) for blanks (3) comprising a tool spindle (2) having an axis of rotation (2.8) and mounted in a bearing housing (1.2) disposed on the machine housing side. A force sensor (5) is also provided, which is disposed between the tool spindle (2) and the bearing housing (1.2) for the purpose of detecting the machining force acting on the tool spindle (2), wherein the tool spindle (2) can be supported against the bearing housing (1.2) directly or indirectly via the force sensor (5).