3D Mesh Validation for Dental Restoration Component Labeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dental appliance fabrication systems face accuracy issues due to 2D to 3D conversion inefficiencies and conflicting labels, leading to complex and error-prone processing.

Innovation Solution

Direct labeling of 3D mesh elements without intermediate 2D images, using machine learning techniques like MeshCNN and Encoder for improved segmentation and cleanup, and employing representation learning to enhance model performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If 2D to 3D conversion is performed using existing projection operations, then the processing can be completed, but the accuracy is lost and conflicting labels are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of projecting 2D labels onto 3D mesh elements (traditional approach), the patent inverts the process by directly labeling 3D mesh elements in their native 3D space. This avoids the fundamental accuracy loss inherent in 2D-to-3D projection methods while eliminating conflicting labels caused by multiple projections of the same 3D element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from operating in 2D image space to operating directly in 3D mesh space. By performing labeling operations natively in 3D space rather than converting from 2D, the system preserves spatial relationships and geometric accuracy while avoiding the dimensionality conversion errors that cause conflicting labels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If additional machine learning models are added to disambiguate conflicting labels, then the accuracy may be improved, but the system complexity and error increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabel accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the source of conflicting labels by eliminating the 2D-to-3D projection step entirely. By working directly with 3D mesh elements, the system prevents the generation of conflicting labels at the source, making additional disambiguation models unnecessary and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs labeling operations directly on 3D mesh elements from the beginning, preventing conflicting labels from being generated in the first place. This preliminary action of working in the correct 3D space avoids the need for subsequent corrective measures or additional models to resolve conflicts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If 2D images are used as intermediate representation, then the processing can be simplified, but the computational overhead increases and accuracy is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing easeVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the intermediate 2D image representation step from the processing pipeline. By working directly with 3D mesh data throughout the entire workflow, the system eliminates the computational overhead of generating, processing, and converting 2D images while preserving geometric accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a unified 3D-based processing framework that handles all labeling operations directly in 3D space. This universal approach eliminates the need for separate 2D image processing pipelines and conversion steps, simplifying the overall system while reducing computational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250375272A1Validation for the Placement and Generation of Components for Dental Restoration Appliances
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 SOLVENTUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES CO
  • US20250375272A1 patent drawing
  • US20250375272A1 patent drawing
  • US20250375272A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques for training one or more neural networks to automatically validate geometrical characteristics of a digital representation of a dental restoration appliance component are disclosed including analyzing one or more assigned labels, automatically generating output that specifies whether the dental restoration appliance is incorrect, automatically training the neural network based on the one or more result labels assigned by the neural network.