Dental Milling Force Simulation for Adaptive Process Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machining methods for dental objects are inefficient, as they are designed for worst-case scenarios and do not accurately simulate dynamic behavior or machining forces, leading to slow processes and resource-intensive approaches.

Innovation Solution

A machining method that simulates machining forces based on specified process parameters and adjusts them to maintain a predetermined maximum or minimum value, allowing for optimized toolpaths and process parameters to enhance efficiency, reduce wear, and prevent peak forces, using a digital twin and real-time spindle current measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If milling templates are designed for worst-case scenario, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by simulating and optimizing toolpaths before actual machining. The system calculates optimal feed rates, spindle speeds, and toolpaths in advance based on workpiece geometry and material properties, storing these optimized parameters for execution. This allows the system to achieve high productivity during actual machining while maintaining reliability through pre-validated parameters that avoid worst-case scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by adapting process parameters dynamically based on simulated machining forces. The system adjusts feed rates and spindle speeds according to the specific geometry and material conditions of each workpiece, rather than using fixed worst-case parameters. This dynamic adaptation enables optimized productivity for each specific case while maintaining reliability through simulation-based validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If simulation models are resource-intensive, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies copying by creating a digital twin or virtual model of the workpiece and machining process. The system imports CAD data to generate a digital representation that can be simulated repeatedly without physical resources. This virtual copy enables precise calculation of machining forces and optimization of toolpaths while avoiding the need for resource-intensive physical prototypes or trial machining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Device complexity

If dynamic behavior is not considered in models, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses this contradiction by performing preliminary simulation that specifically includes dynamic behavior analysis. The system calculates time-dependent machining forces, accelerations, and vibrations before machining begins, allowing optimization of toolpaths and parameters that account for dynamic effects. This preliminary dynamic analysis enables high manufacturing precision without requiring complex real-time control systems during actual machining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230364727A1Machining method for manufacturing a dental object
Publication Date: 2023.11.16 IVOCLAR VIVADENT AG
  • US20230364727A1 patent drawing
  • US20230364727A1 patent drawing
  • US20230364727A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A machining method including the steps of providing (S101) a data set (101) for the milling process in which at least one process parameter (103) for machining a workpiece (105) is specified; simulating (S102) a machining force on the workpiece (105) based on the data set; and adjusting (S103) the process parameter (103) for machining until a predetermined maximum value for the machining force is reached or a predetermined minimum value is maintained.