Dental 3D Printing Drying Control Using Temperature Profiling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drying or evaporating inorganically filled carrier fluids based on polar or nonpolar solvents in 3D printing is time-consuming and difficult to monitor reliably, often leading to uneven drying and potential cracking of printed layers.

Innovation Solution

A method involving temperature profiling during solvent evaporation, using an airflow to accelerate evaporation, and controlling the process based on detected temperature profiles to ensure uniform and crack-free drying of each layer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If solvent evaporation is accelerated by increasing temperature or airflow, then drying time is reduced, but risk of cracking and uneven drying increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrying speedVSAvoiduniformity of drying
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the temperature profile of the printed layer during solvent evaporation and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust processing parameters. The temperature profile serves as a real-time indicator of drying progress, allowing the system to adapt airflow and temperature control to maintain uniform drying without cracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The drying process transitions from static, experience-based timing to a dynamic, sensor-driven process. The system continuously adapts airflow rates and temperature based on real-time temperature profile measurements, optimizing drying speed while preventing cracking through responsive parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If drying time is extended to ensure complete solvent removal, then cracking is prevented, but production time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack preventionVSAvoiddrying time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical/waiting-based drying monitoring with optical sensing (infrared temperature measurement). This substitution enables real-time, non-contact monitoring of the drying process, providing precise information about solvent evaporation progress without physical intervention or extended waiting periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The printed layer itself provides the monitoring signal through its temperature profile during evaporation. The endothermic evaporation process creates a characteristic temperature signature that automatically indicates drying progress, eliminating the need for external probes or complex sensing systems within the layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If temperature is increased to accelerate evaporation, then productivity improves, but support material may melt

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaporation rateVSAvoidsupport material integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different thermal conditions to different regions of the build platform. Printed layers receive targeted heating and airflow for accelerated evaporation, while support material areas maintain lower temperatures to prevent melting. This spatial differentiation of thermal treatment allows simultaneous optimization of drying speed and material integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If empirical experience is used to determine drying time, then process simplicity is maintained, but reliability of drying completion is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoiddrying completion accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback control using infrared temperature profiling to monitor solvent evaporation in real-time. This objective, data-driven approach replaces subjective empirical judgment with measurable, consistent criteria for determining drying completion, significantly improving reliability while maintaining automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise monitoring and control of the drying process, allowing for faster, higher-quality printing with reduced waste and improved layer bonding, independent of environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

the temperature profile is recorded by an infrared camera or an electromagnetic radiation sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared radiation detection: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

an airflow is directed onto the printed layer to evaporate the solvent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

an airflow onto the pressure layer is controlled based on the detected temperature profile

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced convection: Forced Convection

Implementation Method 4

active regulation or control of the printer can be carried out based on an exothermic or endothermic reaction of the printing layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEndothermic reaction: Endothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentEP4663381A1Method and printer for producing a dental object
Publication Date: 2025.12.17 IVOCLAR VIVADENT AG
  • EP4663381A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4663381A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4663381A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Method for producing a dental object, comprising the steps of printing (S101) a printed layer of the dental object; evaporating (S102) a solvent of the printed layer; and recording (S103) a temperature profile during the evaporation of the solvent.