Dental Sensor Overmoulding for Ergonomics and Shock Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current dental intraoral sensors are uncomfortable due to sharp corners and hard materials, difficult to differentiate from competitors, and lack ergonomic design, while also requiring additional protection against shocks and electromagnetic interference.

Innovation Solution

An intraoral dental radiological image sensor with a casing made of hard plastic and overmolded flexible plastic material, providing a smooth rubber consistency on corners and internal support areas, reducing roughness and enhancing ergonomics, while maintaining mechanical resistance and shock protection without additional foams or electromagnetic shielding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the casing is made of hard plastic material for mechanical resistance, then the structural strength is improved, but the comfort and ergonomics deteriorate due to sharp angles and hard surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical resistanceVSAvoidcomfort and ergonomics
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different material properties to different regions of the casing. The hard plastic material is used for the main body to provide mechanical resistance, while flexible plastic material is applied locally to corners and edges to provide comfort. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by having each region possess the quality appropriate for its function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The casing combines hard plastic material and flexible plastic material in a composite structure. The hard material provides structural strength while the flexible material provides comfort. This composite approach allows both requirements to be satisfied simultaneously in different parts of the same component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If additional protective sheets (foam, elastomer, aluminum foil, lead foil) are added for shock protection, then the reliability is improved, but the device complexity and bulk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock protectionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protective function is merged with the casing structure itself. The flexible plastic material is integrated into the casing as an inherent component rather than being added as a separate protective layer. This merging eliminates the need for additional protective sheets while maintaining shock protection functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure of hard and flexible plastic materials provides both structural integrity and shock absorption in a single integrated component, eliminating the need for multiple separate protective layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Volume of moving object

If the casing is made thin for size reasons, then the compactness is improved, but the transparency increases causing unwanted images from ambient light

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize compactnessVSAvoidambient light interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible plastic material is applied locally to specific areas of the casing, particularly corners and edges, rather than covering the entire surface. This local application provides the necessary properties without making the entire casing thick, thus maintaining compactness while addressing light interference in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a more comfortable, visually appealing, and distinctive sensor that is solid and well-protected against shocks, with reduced bulk and potential for reduced electromagnetic interference, allowing for easier handling and positioning.

Implementation Method 1

overmouldings in one flexible plastic material with a smooth rubber consistency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the parts molded in flexible material inside the housing being connected to parts in flexible material outside the housing by bridges formed in openings in the hard material parts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentEP2136710B1Dental radiology image sensor with flexible overmoulding
Publication Date: 2012.08.29 E2V SEMICON
  • EP2136710B1 patent drawingFigure 1~5
  • EP2136710B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

The invention relates to an intra-oral dental radiology sensor. The sensor includes an electronic image-acquisition module and a housing (30) moulded from a hard plastic material (32) locally provided with overmouldings (34) of a more flexible plastic material having a more flexible gum consistence and covering the hard plastic material on areas located outside the housing and corresponding to protruding angular portions of the hard plastic material, and on areas located inside the housing at locations against which the electronic module may bear. The flexible plastic material (34) is preferably a copolymer of the SEBS type (Styrene-Ethylene-Butylene-Styrene) while the hard plastic material (32) is preferably a polyamide. The patient's comfort is improved and the module is better protected against shocks without increasing the overall dimensions thereof.