Microfluidic DEP Arrays with Low-Resistance Conductors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microfluidic devices with multiple DEP electrode arrays face challenges in achieving consistent particle manipulation due to variance in electrode performance, leading to unreliable diagnostic results, and require high power supply, which is difficult to manage without increasing conducting material that may delaminate from the substrate.

Innovation Solution

A microfluidic device with DEP electrode arrays connected in parallel, where the resistance of the connecting conductors is significantly less than the total resistance of the electrode arrays, ensuring consistent electric field distribution and minimizing power dissipation, using conducting leads with internal gaps to enhance adhesion and reduce delamination risk.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple parallel DEP electrode arrays are implemented to increase processing capacity, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to variance in electrode performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidelectrode performance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into multiple independent parallel channels, each with its own DEP electrode array. This segmentation allows independent optimization and control of each electrode array, enabling consistent performance across multiple arrays while maintaining high processing capacity through parallel operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each DEP electrode array is designed with specific local characteristics optimized for its position and function within the parallel channel system. The electrode arrays are configured with tailored geometries and connection arrangements to ensure uniform electric field distribution and consistent particle manipulation performance across all channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If high power is supplied to drive multiple DEP electrode arrays, then productivity is improved, but temperature increases causing harmful heating effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidpower dissipation heating
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The power supply system is segmented into multiple independent connections for each parallel electrode array. This allows distributed power delivery, reducing the current density and heat generation in any single connection path while maintaining the total power required for high productivity across all arrays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Conductor traces with optimized geometry and material properties serve as intermediaries between the power supply and electrode arrays. These conductors are designed to minimize resistive heating while efficiently transmitting power, acting as thermal managers in the high-power delivery system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Use of energy by moving object

If the quantity of conducting material is increased to reduce power dissipation, then energy efficiency is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to delamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower dissipationVSAvoidadhesion quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The conducting material properties are optimized by changing parameters such as material composition, thickness, and cross-sectional geometry. These parameter adjustments achieve sufficient electrical conductivity with reduced material quantity, minimizing the risk of delamination while maintaining low power dissipation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The conducting traces are formed using composite material structures that combine materials with different properties. This allows optimization of both electrical conductivity and adhesion characteristics, achieving low power dissipation without compromising manufacturing precision or causing delamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures consistent operation of DEP electrode arrays across multiple channels, maintaining reliable diagnostic performance while reducing power consumption and preventing conducting material delamination, thus addressing the issues of variance and power management in microfluidic devices.

Implementation Method 1

Dielectrophoresis (DEP) is a well-known phenomenon that can be used to selectively move and/or manipulate particles based on the dielectric properties of the particles. The particle will move either in the direction of a field gradient (positive DEP) or in the opposite direction (negative DEP).

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDielectrophoresis: Electrophoresis

Data Source

PatentUS12179200B2Microfluidic device with DEP arrays
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 QUANTUMDX GROUP
  • US12179200B2 patent drawing
  • US12179200B2 patent drawing
  • US12179200B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Microfluidic device having a plurality of microfluidic channels and corresponding dielectrophoresis (DEP) electrode arrays, each channel arranged to direct fluid over a DEP electrode array such that in use target particles are manipulated by the DEP electrode array. The device also has a first connection point and second connection point for connecting the device to an alternating current source, a first input of each DEP electrode array connected to the first connection point via the first conductor and second input of each DEP electrode array connected to the second connection point via the second conductor. A resistance of the first conductor between the first input of each electrode and the first connection point, and a resistance of the second conductor between the second input of each electrode and the second connection point is substantially at least an order of magnitude less than a total resistance of the connected electrode arrays.