Software Dependency Vulnerability Scanning During Development

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing software development processes are vulnerable to vulnerabilities associated with third-party software libraries, which are not effectively managed throughout the software lifecycle, leading to potential exploitation risks.

Innovation Solution

A multi-layered system for managing software dependencies, including detection, enforcement, and inventory of vulnerabilities, with policies to block or alert on vulnerable downloads, continuous feedback, and centralized repository management, to mitigate risks and ensure secure software development.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If third-party software libraries are used to expedite software development, then productivity is improved, but security reliability deteriorates due to vulnerabilities in these libraries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware development speedVSAvoidsecurity reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary vulnerability scanning and assessment of third-party libraries during the development phase, before the vulnerabilities can be exploited. This includes continuous monitoring of dependency repositories and proactive identification of security issues in libraries before they are integrated into the final software product.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback mechanisms that monitor software dependencies throughout the development lifecycle. When vulnerabilities are detected in third-party libraries, the system provides immediate feedback to developers through alerts and notifications, enabling rapid response and remediation while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If vulnerability scanning and management processes are implemented, then security reliability is improved, but device complexity increases due to multi-layered detection and enforcement systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple vulnerability management functions into a unified platform that combines dependency tracking, vulnerability scanning, risk assessment, and enforcement capabilities. This consolidation reduces the complexity that would result from separate tools while maintaining comprehensive security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The vulnerability management system is designed as a universal platform that can scan and manage multiple types of software dependencies (packages, modules, libraries) across different programming languages and frameworks. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized tools, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If continuous vulnerability monitoring and enforcement policies are applied, then security reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to scanning and feedback processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity reliabilityVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs vulnerability scanning continuously in the background during normal development activities rather than requiring separate scanning phases. This allows vulnerability detection to occur concurrently with software development, minimizing the time loss while maintaining continuous security monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system caches vulnerability information and performs preliminary assessments of dependencies during installation and integration phases, so that more comprehensive scanning can be performed later without significant time penalty. This preliminary action reduces the time loss during continuous monitoring by pre-processing data during natural development pauses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250291582A1Management of software dependencies
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US20250291582A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291582A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291582A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example computer system for managing software dependencies can include: one or more processors; and non-transitory computer-readable storage media encoding instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, causes the computer system to: identify a vulnerability associated with a dependency for a computer program as the computer program is being developed; determine a severity of the vulnerability; and manage the dependency based upon the severity of the vulnerability.