Deployable-Anchor Intervertebral Cages for Narrow Access and Strong Fixation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current intervertebral cages face challenges in navigating the narrow access pathway to the intervertebral space due to the natural curvature of vertebral bodies, and require strong anchorage to prevent dislodgment and migration, while traditional manufacturing methods have weak seams that can fail over time.

Innovation Solution

Intervertebral cages with deployable anchors manufactured using additive manufacturing techniques, such as SLM, that allow for a reduced insertion configuration and subsequent expansion, eliminating the need for external fixation and featuring a customizable, porous structure for enhanced fixation and osteosynthesis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the cage is designed with a larger size to provide stronger structural support and anchorage, then the fixation strength is improved, but the ability to navigate the narrow access pathway deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation strengthVSAvoidcage size
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cage is divided into multiple segments or struts that can be collapsed together to reduce the overall size for insertion, then expanded after placement to provide the necessary structural support and fixation strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cage transitions from a compressed, low-profile state during insertion to an expanded, high-strength state after placement, allowing it to adapt its size dynamically to satisfy both navigation and fixation requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional manufacturing methods are used, then the manufacturing process is simpler, but the seams create weak points that reduce reliability over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidseam strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple struts and components are merged into a single monolithic structure through additive manufacturing, eliminating the need for seams or joints that would create weak points while maintaining manufacturing feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the cage is designed to accommodate the natural curvature of vertebral bodies, then the adaptability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurvature accommodationVSAvoidcage configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cage struts are designed with curved geometries that match the natural curvature of vertebral bodies, allowing the device to adapt to anatomical variations while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentUS12350167B2Intervertebral cages with deployable anchors
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 EIT EMERGING IMPLANT TECH GMBH
  • US12350167B2 patent drawing
  • US12350167B2 patent drawing
  • US12350167B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are interbody fusion spacers, or cages, for insertion between adjacent vertebrae. The cages may have integrated and deployable anchors that allow the cage to have a first, insertion configuration characterized by a reduced size to facilitate insertion through a narrow access passage and into the intervertebral space. Once implanted, the anchors of the cages may be deployed to enable better fixation to bone. The cages may promote fusion to further enhance spine stability by immobilizing the adjacent vertebral bodies.