Deployable Head Restraint Airbag for Wider Impact Reaction Surface

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing airbag assemblies in vehicles face design restrictions due to limited cross-seat width of head restraints, which can be inadequate as a reaction surface during certain vehicle impacts, as they do not effectively expand to accommodate the inflated airbag.

Innovation Solution

The vehicle-seat assembly incorporates a sliding member and track system where the airbag's inflation forces the sliding member from an undeployed to a deployed position, increasing the cross-seat width of the head restraint, allowing it to operate as a larger reaction surface during impacts, with multiple sliding members moving in opposite directions to enhance the footprint.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If the head restraint uses a fixed structure, then the manufacturing is simple, but the cross-seat width is limited and insufficient as a reaction surface during impacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-seat width of head restraintVSAvoidhead restraint structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The head restraint structure transitions from a fixed static configuration to a dynamic deployable structure. The sliding member moves along the track from a retracted position to a deployed position, dynamically increasing the cross-seat width when needed during impact events, thereby resolving the contradiction between simplicity and functional area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The head restraint is divided into separate functional components: a fixed frame, a movable sliding member, and a track system. This segmentation allows the sliding member to independently extend the cross-seat width when required, while the fixed frame maintains structural integrity, thus increasing the reaction surface area without overly complicating the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of stationary object

If multiple sliding members move in opposite directions, then the footprint and reaction surface area are enhanced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefootprint of head restraintVSAvoidsliding member system
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs asymmetric deployment where sliding members move in opposite directions from a central position. This asymmetric configuration allows both sides of the head restraint to extend simultaneously, maximizing the footprint and reaction surface area. The symmetry in motion pattern simplifies the control mechanism despite the increased functional area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Extent of automation

If the airbag inflation forces the sliding member to deploy, then no additional actuator is needed, but the structural design becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment mechanismVSAvoidtrack and sliding member structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The airbag inflation process itself provides the force needed to deploy the sliding member. As the airbag inflates, it pushes against the sliding member, automatically moving it from the retracted to the deployed position. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for separate actuators or motors, achieving automation without proportionally increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The track serves as an intermediary element that guides and constrains the sliding member's motion. It translates the radial inflation force of the airbag into linear motion of the sliding member along the track, enabling automatic deployment while maintaining structural control and simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution alleviates design constraints by expanding the head restraint's footprint, effectively utilizing the airbag's inflation force to enhance its role as a reaction surface, thereby improving occupant safety during vehicle impacts.

Implementation Method 1

the inflator activates and provides inflation medium to the airbag. This pressurizes the airbag to control the kinematics of an occupant during certain vehicle impacts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

The base moves with the sliding member from the undeployed position to the deployed position of the sliding member as the airbag moves from the uninflated position to the inflated position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce: Force

Data Source

PatentUS12071092B1Airbag on head restraint
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12071092B1 patent drawing
  • US12071092B1 patent drawing
  • US12071092B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes a vehicle-seat assembly. The vehicle-seat assembly includes a vehicle seat having a seatback. The vehicle-seat assembly includes a head restraint having a frame supported by the seatback and a sliding member supported by the frame. The vehicle-seat assembly includes a track between the sliding member and the frame. The sliding member is slidable along the track from an undeployed position to a deployed position. The vehicle-seat assembly includes an airbag inflatable from an uninflated position to an inflated position. The airbag has a base fixed to the sliding member in the uninflated position and the inflated position. The base forces the sliding member from the undeployed position to the deployed position as the airbag moves from the uninflated position to the inflated position.