Deployable Track Propulsion for Robotic Mower Traction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic devices, such as robotized vegetation mowers, face challenges with traction on sub-optimal surfaces, leading to potential stalling and increased energy consumption, wear on propulsion components, and the need for extensive land grading to ensure navigation.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a deployable vehicle propulsion system, such as a continuous track, that can be actuated between retracted and deployed states to enhance traction, reducing the load on primary drive wheels and allowing operation on slopes and surfaces with poor traction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a robotic device uses a propulsion system always employed to ensure adequate traction, then traction reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system transitions from a static always-employed configuration to a dynamic deployable configuration. The continuous track is deployed only when additional traction is detected or required, and retracted when operating on surfaces with adequate traction, optimizing the balance between reliability and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic device applies different propulsion configurations to different operating conditions. Instead of uniformly employing the full propulsion system always, the system adapts its traction provision locally to match the actual terrain requirements, using the continuous track only where and when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If a robotic device uses a propulsion system always employed to ensure adequate traction, then traction reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction reliabilityVSAvoidpropulsion system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic deployment control to manage complexity. Rather than permanently engaging all propulsion components, the system selectively deploys the continuous track based on terrain assessment, reducing the operational complexity while maintaining reliability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The propulsion system is segmented into primary drive wheels and a deployable continuous track. This segmentation allows the system to use the simpler primary wheels for normal operation and only engage the more complex continuous track when additional traction is required, managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If primary drive wheels are made larger or more aggressive to improve traction, then traction capability is improved, but device complexity increases and wear on components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction capabilityVSAvoiddrive wheel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using permanently large or aggressive drive wheels that会增加 complexity and wear, the system dynamically deploys a continuous track when additional traction is needed. This allows the primary drive wheels to remain simpler in design while still achieving high traction capability when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The aggressive traction function is extracted from the primary drive wheels and placed in the deployable continuous track. This allows the primary wheels to maintain simpler, less-wearing designs while the track provides the aggressive traction capability only when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the robotic device operates on surfaces with poor traction, then adaptability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain adaptabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts its propulsion configuration to terrain conditions. When poor traction surfaces are detected, the continuous track is deployed to provide the necessary traction. When operating on surfaces with adequate traction, the track is retracted, reducing energy consumption while maintaining the ability to handle difficult terrain when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20230320261A1Robotic Device with Deployable Propulsion System
Publication Date: 2023.10.12 DS2 0 LLC
  • US20230320261A1 patent drawing
  • US20230320261A1 patent drawing
  • US20230320261A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In general, the subject matter described in this disclosure can be embodied in a robotic mowing device that includes a main body, a left-side driving wheel, a right-side driving wheel, and one or more motors to drive the left-side driving wheel and the right-side driving wheel to cause the left-side driving wheel and the right-side driving wheel to turn. The robotic mowing device also includes a deployable propulsion device that includes a rolling member and that is adapted to actuate the rolling member between a deployed state in which the rolling member is adapted to contact the ground surface, and a retracted state in which the rolling member is held apart from the ground surface.