Deposit Process Manager Decisioning Engine for Automated Check Clearing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current deposit processing systems in the financial industry lack comprehensive management solutions, leading to inefficiencies in check deposits, increased processing costs, and reduced service quality due to manual intervention and lack of automation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a Deposit Process Manager (DPManager) system that includes a decisioning engine, deposit delay component, and de-queueing component, which automates and centralizes the deposit process, allowing for electronic check clearing, data capture without manual intervention, and advanced fraud detection, while optimizing clearing entities and reducing errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual intervention is used in deposit processing, then service quality can be maintained through human judgment, but processing costs increase and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated validation rules that independently evaluate deposit transactions without human intervention. The decisioning engine automatically applies business rules to determine deposit outcomes, eliminating the need for manual processing while maintaining consistent service quality through predefined criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical processing is replaced with an automated electronic decisioning engine that uses software-based validation rules. The system substitutes human operators with an automated computational system that processes deposits electronically, increasing efficiency while maintaining service quality through consistent rule application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If comprehensive validation rules are implemented, then deposit accuracy and fraud detection improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposit accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system is segmented into multiple independent rule components, each handling specific validation aspects. The decisioning engine is divided into separate validation rules that can be individually configured and maintained, reducing overall system complexity while achieving comprehensive validation through the combination of specialized rule modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a rule engine as an intermediary layer between the deposit processing system and the validation logic. This mediator component manages the complexity by providing a standardized interface for implementing validation rules, allowing comprehensive validation without directly complicating the core processing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated decisioning is implemented, then processing speed increases, but adaptability to new deposit types may decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidadaptability to new deposit types
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The validation rules are designed to be dynamic and configurable, allowing the system to adapt to new deposit types without requiring fundamental system changes. The decisioning engine can dynamically load and apply different rule sets based on deposit characteristics, maintaining high processing speed while enabling flexibility through parameter-based rule configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter-based rule configuration to maintain adaptability. By changing parameters and rule conditions rather than restructuring the core system, the patent enables the automated decisioning engine to handle new deposit types efficiently. The rules can be modified through parameter adjustments, preserving processing speed while achieving versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8275715B2Apparatuses, methods and systems for a deposit process manager decisioning engine
Publication Date: 2012.09.25 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US8275715B2 patent drawing
  • US8275715B2 patent drawing
  • US8275715B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure details the implementation of apparatuses, methods, and systems for a deposit process manager (“DPManager”) including aspects of a decisioning engine, aspects of a deposit delay component, and of a de queueing component. The DPManager is supported by the first workflow process engine in the financial industry to provide end-to-end solutions for complex brokerage and retirement deposits and check clearing. The OPManger can automatically route checks to be cleared electronically at numerous banks/clearing entities based on routing number, time of day, bank fees and float expense. The DPManager can capture data electronically without manual intervention with deposit slips.