Automated Deprecated Component Risk Assessment in Data Centers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Administrators face challenges in assessing the impact of deprecated components in data centers, including identifying reliance on deprecated systems and estimating resources and time required for replacement, especially in large-scale configurations with numerous configuration files.

Innovation Solution

A method is provided to manage Information Handling Systems (IHSs) by receiving notifications of deprecated components, identifying configuration files invoking them, estimating resources for replacement, generating a dependency tree, determining a risk level, and replacing references with updated instructions, while estimating resources based on compilation errors and test routines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If administrators manually identify and replace deprecated components in large-scale data centers, then replacement accuracy can be maintained, but the time and resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidreplacement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically identifying configuration files that invoke deprecated components, generating dependency trees, and determining replacement sequences without human intervention. The processor autonomously executes the entire workflow from notification receipt to risk level determination, eliminating manual administrative effort while maintaining high accuracy through systematic automated analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical administrative processes with an automated computational system. Instead of administrators manually searching through configuration files and analyzing dependencies, the system uses automated text processing, pattern matching, and algorithmic dependency analysis to identify and evaluate deprecated component usage, dramatically reducing time while preserving identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If all configuration files are analyzed to ensure complete identification of deprecated components, then identification completeness improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the analysis process into distinct phases: first identifying configuration files containing deprecated component references, then generating a dependency tree to map relationships between components, and finally determining replacement sequences. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity by breaking down the comprehensive analysis task into smaller, more tractable sub-tasks while ensuring complete identification across all configuration files.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by first generating a dependency tree that maps all relationships involving deprecated components before proceeding to replacement activities. This preliminary structuring of information simplifies subsequent analysis and replacement operations, making the overall process more manageable while ensuring complete identification of all affected configuration files and dependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If detailed dependency trees are generated to assess replacement risk accurately, then risk assessment precision improves, but processing resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment precisionVSAvoidprocessing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by focusing the detailed dependency tree generation only on configuration files that actually invoke deprecated components, rather than analyzing all configuration files in the system. The dependency tree is constructed selectively to capture only the relevant relationships needed for accurate risk assessment of the specific deprecated component, reducing unnecessary processing resources while maintaining precision for the affected areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11256521B2Systems and methods for evaluating and updating deprecated products
Publication Date: 2022.02.22 DELL PROD LP
  • US11256521B2 patent drawing
  • US11256521B2 patent drawing
  • US11256521B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and systems provide tools for evaluating the impact of component deprecations with a datacenter formed from a plurality of IHSs. Upon receiving a notification of a deprecated component, configuration files that invoke the deprecated component and are in use within the datacenter are identified. Estimates are generated for the resources that would be required to replace references to the deprecated component within the identified configuration files. Estimates may be generated based on compilation errors, test suite failures and historical error repair data. A tree is generated of the dependencies on the deprecated component within the identified configuration files. Based on characteristics of the dependency tree and also based on the resource estimates for replacing references to the deprecated component, a risk level is generated for the deprecated component. The risk level may be generated for individual IHSs, groups of IHSs, or an entire data center.