Depth and Intensity MSER Fusion for Object Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing feature detection methods, such as MSER, are highly dependent on image intensity and struggle with reliability in identifying and tracking objects under varying conditions, leading to issues with extraneous region identification.

Innovation Solution

The method processes both depth and intensity data to identify 'strong' maximally stable extremal regions (MSERs) that are consistent across different viewing conditions, reducing extraneous region identification by leveraging both depth and intensity MSERs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If MSER is used for feature detection based on image intensity, then feature detection capability is improved, but reliability under varying conditions deteriorates due to high dependence on intensity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature detection capabilityVSAvoidreliability under varying conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines intensity-based MSER detection with depth-based MSER detection to create a unified feature detection system. By merging the strengths of both intensity and depth information, the system achieves improved reliability under varying conditions while maintaining feature detection capability. The combination allows the system to overcome the limitations of intensity-only methods by incorporating depth data that is less sensitive to lighting variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces depth data as an intermediary element that mediates between the intensity information and the final feature detection results. By using depth MSERs as an additional source of information, the system can validate and confirm features detected from intensity data, thereby improving reliability without sacrificing detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Quantity of substance

If intensity-based MSERs are used for object identification, then number of identified regions is increased, but reliability deteriorates due to identification of extraneous regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of identified regionsVSAvoidreliability of object identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates depth-based MSERs as a separate verification layer. By taking out the depth information and using it to filter the intensity-based MSER results, the system removes extraneous regions that were incorrectly identified. This extraction process allows the system to maintain the quantity of identified regions from intensity data while eliminating the unreliable ones through depth verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where depth MSER detection results are used to validate and refine the intensity MSER results. The depth information provides feedback that confirms or rejects potential object regions, thereby improving the reliability of object identification while preserving the comprehensive region detection capability of the intensity-based approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If only depth data is used for object detection, then reliability is improved by reducing extraneous regions, but detection completeness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of object detectionVSAvoiddetection completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges depth-based MSER detection with intensity-based MSER detection to achieve both reliability and completeness. By combining the two detection approaches, the system leverages the reliability advantage of depth data while compensating for its lower completeness through the addition of intensity data, which can detect additional regions that depth alone might miss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9639951B2Object detection and tracking using depth data
Publication Date: 2017.05.02 KHALIFA UNIV OF SCI & TECH
  • US9639951B2 patent drawing
  • US9639951B2 patent drawing
  • US9639951B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for detecting and/or tracking one or more objects utilize depth data. An example method of detecting one or more objects in image data includes receiving depth image data corresponding to a depth image view point relative to the one or more objects. A series of binary threshold depth images are formed from the depth image data. Each of the binary threshold depth images is based on a respective depth. One or more depth extremal regions in which image pixels have the same value are identified for each of the binary depth threshold images. One or more depth maximally stable extremal regions are selected from the identified depth extremal regions based on change in area of the one or more respective depth extremal regions for different depths.