DER Scheduling Across Long-, Mid-, and Real-Time Grid Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing energy management systems for electrical power systems with integrated distributed energy resources face challenges in achieving optimal multi-timescale optimization, cost efficiency, and addressing uncertainties in renewable energy generation and load demand fluctuations, with existing algorithms failing to provide flexible and robust solutions that adapt to system changes.

Innovation Solution

A multi-timescale coordinated optimization scheduling method that includes long-, mid-, and short-timescale optimization scheduling, utilizing cloud and edge computing to integrate forecast and real-time data, with model predictive control for DERs, ensuring robustness and adaptability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single optimizer with a single time interval is used for scheduling, then the system structure is simple, but it cannot address multiple needs from long-term operation planning to real-time dispatching control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to address multiple scheduling needsVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The scheduling system is segmented into three distinct optimizers operating at different timescales: a long-term optimizer for operation planning and market participation, a mid-term optimizer for day-ahead scheduling, and a real-time optimizer for dispatching control. Each optimizer handles specific scheduling needs with appropriate time intervals, enabling the system to address multiple requirements simultaneously while maintaining clear functional boundaries that prevent excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a timescale dimension by organizing optimizers hierarchically across different time horizons (long-term, mid-term, real-time). This dimensional approach allows each optimizer to specialize in specific time intervals and scheduling tasks, transforming a potentially complex monolithic system into a structured multi-layered architecture where each layer operates independently at its appropriate timescale

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If different levels of optimization are used for long-term planning to real-time control, then each level can be optimized for its specific time interval, but coordination and information flow among multi-timescale engines becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization precision for specific time intervalsVSAvoidcoordination and information flow complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The long-term optimizer performs preliminary action by establishing operation planning and market participation strategies in advance. These pre-determined plans serve as input constraints and guidance for the mid-term and real-time optimizers, allowing each subsequent optimizer to focus on its specific time interval without needing to reconsider long-term strategic decisions, thereby simplifying coordination while maintaining optimization precision at each level

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an energy management system as an intermediary that coordinates information flow among the multi-timescale optimizers. The EMS manages the hierarchical data exchange, ensuring that long-term plans are properly transmitted to mid-term scheduling, and real-time control actions are aligned with higher-level plans. This intermediary structure standardizes coordination protocols and simplifies the complex information flow between optimizers operating at different timescales

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If heuristic online algorithms are used for real-time dispatching, then the system is simple to implement, but they cannot achieve optimal solutions and are not flexible to system changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidoptimality and adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The real-time optimizer employs dynamic programming or model predictive control that adapts to system changes by continuously updating its model and constraints based on current system state and forecast data. This dynamic approach maintains flexibility to accommodate new distributed energy resources and changing operational conditions while achieving optimal solutions, overcoming the rigidity of heuristic algorithms without sacrificing implementation feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12407173B2Electrical power system and a multi-timescale coordinated optimization scheduling method therefor
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 UNIVERS PTE LTD
  • US12407173B2 patent drawing
  • US12407173B2 patent drawing
  • US12407173B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-timescale coordinated optimization scheduling method for an electrical power system that includes a number of distributed energy resources (DERs) is disclosed. The method includes performing long-timescale optimization scheduling for the electrical power system based at least on renewable energy generation forecast data of the DERs to obtain long-timescale operation planning data. The method further includes performing mid-timescale optimization scheduling for the electrical power system based on the long-timescale operation planning data and measured data of the DERs to obtain mid-timescale operation planning data. The method further includes performing at least close to real-time optimization scheduling for the electrical power system based on the mid-timescale operation planning data, the measured data of the DERs and grid signals of the electrical power system to obtain short-timescale power setpoints for the DERs. An electrical power system in which the method is used is also disclosed.