Dereverberation System for Dynamic Acoustic Environments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dereverberation methods struggle to effectively suppress both early and late reverberation in real-life scenarios, often resulting in signal processing artifacts and failing to improve speech intelligibility, especially in dynamic acoustic environments.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that process early and late reverberation in parallel, combining multiple estimation methods to estimate relevant room acoustic characteristics and adjust the suppression rate, using time-frequency domain techniques like spectral subtraction and Wiener filtering to generate dereverberated signals without artifacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If deconvolution is applied to suppress reverberation, then reverberation distortion is reduced, but processing artifacts are introduced and speech intelligibility is not improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereverberation distortionVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the reverberation suppression task into two distinct parts: early reverberation suppression and late reverberation suppression. Early reflections are handled separately from late reverberation, allowing each to be processed with appropriate techniques. This segmentation avoids the artifacts introduced by attempting to suppress all reverberation uniformly through deconvolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different processing qualities to different parts of the reverberant signal. Early reflections (which contain useful spatial and timbral information) are preserved with minimal suppression, while late reverberation (which degrades intelligibility) is suppressed more aggressively. This local differentiation of processing quality improves speech intelligibility without introducing artifacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If RIR measurements are used for dereverberation, then exact inversion is achieved, but the system becomes non-causal and requires exact measurements that are impossible in dynamic environments

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRIR estimation accuracyVSAvoiddynamic environment adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic adaptation techniques where the dereverberation parameters are continuously adjusted based on changing acoustic conditions. Instead of relying on static RIR measurements, the system adapts to dynamic environments by tracking changes in reverberation characteristics and adjusting suppression parameters accordingly, enabling operation in real-world scenarios where sources and receivers move.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service through blind dereverberation methods that do not require external RIR measurements. The system estimates reverberation parameters directly from the observed mixed signal itself, allowing it to operate autonomously without needing separate measurement processes or prior knowledge of the acoustic environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If blind dereverberation is applied, then no prior information is needed, but processing artifacts are produced and speech intelligibility is not improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprior information requirementVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by estimating early reverberation characteristics before applying late reverberation suppression. By first characterizing the early reflection structure, the system can then apply blind dereverberation techniques more effectively, using the early reverberation estimate as a foundation to guide subsequent processing and avoid artifacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of information

If late reverberation suppression is applied, then speech intelligibility should be improved, but early reverberation artifacts are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech intelligibilityVSAvoidprocessing artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the reverberation into early and late components, applying suppression selectively. Early reverberation is preserved to maintain natural sound quality and avoid artifacts, while late reverberation is suppressed to improve speech intelligibility. This temporal segmentation allows intelligibility improvement without introducing the artifacts that result from aggressive uniform suppression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10891931B2Single-channel, binaural and multi-channel dereverberation
Publication Date: 2021.01.12 META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US10891931B2 patent drawing
  • US10891931B2 patent drawing
  • US10891931B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is presented for estimating and suppressing reverberation from a digital reverberant signal. A method for changing a first reverberation estimation according to another reverberation estimation is further provided. A method for controlling the reverberation suppression rate is also presented.