Derivative Promoter Segmentation for Plant Transformation Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current stress-inducible promoters for transgenic plants, such as XvPSap1, are limited by their large size, which reduces transformation efficiency and stability, leading to poor gene expression levels compared to constitutive promoters.

Innovation Solution

Development of derivative plant promoters from Xerophyta viscosa, specifically XvPSap1D, XvPSap1E, and XvPSap1G, which are approximately 50% shorter and maintain high gene expression levels equivalent to the full-length XvPSap1 promoter, utilizing regulatory elements like TC-rich repeats and MYB transcription factor binding sites.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the full-length XvPSap1 promoter is used to achieve high gene expression levels under abiotic stress, then stress-inducible expression is improved, but the promoter size increases leading to reduced transformation efficiency and stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegene expression levelVSAvoidpromoter size
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The full-length XvPSap1 promoter was divided into multiple derivative fragments (XvPSap1D, XvPSap1E, XvPSap1G) of reduced size. These segments retain the essential regulatory elements needed for abiotic stress-inducible expression while eliminating non-essential regions, thereby achieving high gene expression with smaller promoter sequences that improve transformation efficiency and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Non-essential sequences were extracted and removed from the full-length XvPSap1 promoter to create compressed derivative promoters. The essential regulatory elements responsible for abiotic stress response were retained, while redundant or less critical regions were eliminated, resulting in smaller promoters that maintain high expression levels under stress conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If the full-length XvPSap1 promoter is used to maintain abiotic stress inducibility, then stress response capability is improved, but transformation stability deteriorates due to large DNA sequence length

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestress response capabilityVSAvoidtransformation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The promoter was segmented into essential and non-essential regions. The derivative promoters contain only the critical segments required for abiotic stress response, reducing overall size while preserving reliability. This segmentation ensures that the core functional elements are retained for stress induction while removing portions that may interfere with transformation stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The promoter size parameter was changed from full-length to compressed derivatives. This parameter change reduces the DNA sequence length, improving transformation stability, while the essential regulatory parameters (stress-responsive elements) are maintained to preserve stress response capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If smaller promoter derivatives are used to improve transformation efficiency, then ease of transformation is improved, but gene expression level may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransformation efficiencyVSAvoidgene expression level
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the promoter were analyzed for their functional quality. The derivative promoters were designed to concentrate essential regulatory elements in specific local regions, ensuring that the compact size does not compromise expression levels. Critical transcription factor binding sites and stress-responsive elements were positioned to maintain local functional quality despite overall size reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The promoter size parameter was optimized to balance transformation efficiency and gene expression. By adjusting the length parameter to specific optimal values in the derivative promoters, the invention achieves improved ease of transformation while maintaining sufficient gene expression levels through retention of essential regulatory sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9790513B2Stress inducible derivative promoter
Publication Date: 2017.10.17 UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN
  • US9790513B2 patent drawing
  • US9790513B2 patent drawing
  • US9790513B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to abiotic stress-inducible derivative promoters from Xerophyta viscosa, nucleotide cassettes, recombinant vectors, cells and transgenic plants containing the promoter in operable linkage with a heterologous transcribable DNA sequence.