Powered Descent Thrust Vector Control for Accurate Spacecraft Landing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spacecraft landing guidance techniques face challenges in accurately navigating to a desired target point due to initial condition errors, such as velocity and position discrepancies, and errors related to specific thrust and initial mass, which current methods struggle to effectively mitigate.

Innovation Solution

A spacecraft system that includes a thrust vector control device and a main control device, which calculates and adjusts the thrust vector based on acquired state quantities like acceleration parameters, burn time variation, and initial cross-range position and velocity errors, using polynomials to guide the spacecraft to a target point by controlling engine combustion and thrust direction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional guidance methods are used, then the guidance process is simple, but the guidance accuracy deteriorates due to various errors in initial conditions and spacecraft parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance accuracyVSAvoidguidance logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the parameter representation from using raw acceleration values to using the reciprocal of acceleration (1/a). This transformation linearizes the relationship between acceleration and time, allowing polynomial fitting to accurately model the guidance trajectory despite variations in initial conditions and spacecraft parameters. The main control device calculates polynomial coefficients based on 1/a values, which compensates for errors in initial mass and specific thrust without requiring complex adaptive guidance logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If polynomial fitting with reciprocal acceleration is used, then the guidance accuracy improves, but the calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding point accuracyVSAvoidcalculation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary calculation of polynomial coefficients before the actual landing guidance execution. The main control device calculates the coefficients A and B of the polynomial equation 1/a = At + B based on initial measurements, and then uses these pre-calculated coefficients to determine the thrust vector throughout the descent. This preliminary action eliminates the need for complex real-time iterative calculations, significantly improving calculation efficiency while maintaining high landing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the guidance logic is designed to deal with various errors, then the error compensation improves, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror compensation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements a feedback mechanism where the main control device continuously monitors the actual acceleration of the spacecraft and compares it with the expected acceleration based on the polynomial model. The difference (error) is used to adjust the thrust vector in real-time, compensating for errors in initial conditions, mass, and specific thrust. This feedback approach provides robust error compensation while keeping the control logic relatively simple, as it only requires calculating the deviation from the polynomial trajectory and applying corrective thrust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for precise guidance and correction of errors, ensuring the spacecraft lands accurately at the desired target point by effectively managing thrust and trajectory adjustments during powered descent.

Implementation Method 1

an engine (11)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

a thrust vector control device (12) configured to control a thrust vector as a direction of thrust acting on the spacecraft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust: Force

Implementation Method 3

an acceleration sensor (18) configured to detect an acceleration a of the spacecraft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration detection: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 4

making a spacecraft land on a desired point of a gravitational body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS11485521B2Spacecraft and control device
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD
  • US11485521B2 patent drawing
  • US11485521B2 patent drawing
  • US11485521B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spacecraft including: an engine; a thrust vector control device controlling a thrust vector as a direction of a thrust acting on the spacecraft; and a main control device configured to acquire state quantities of the spacecraft in a powered descending in which the spacecraft is guided to a target point while the engine generates the thrust, and generate a throttling command by which combustion of the engine is controlled and an operation command by which the thrust vector control device is operated. The state quantities contain a first acceleration parameter and a second acceleration parameter. The first and second acceleration parameters are calculated as coefficients A and B obtained by fitting based on acceleration of the spacecraft previously detected, supposing the following equation is satisfied between a reciprocal number 1/a of the acceleration a of the spacecraft and time t:1/a=−At+B  (1).