Liquid Hydrocarbon Desulfurization via Shear Mixing and Sorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for desulfurizing liquid hydrocarbons, such as hydro-desulfurization and oxidative desulfurization, are costly, time-consuming, and face operational challenges, limiting their effectiveness in reducing sulfur emissions efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A system and method involving multiple processing units with reactor assemblies and sorption systems, using shear mixing and sorbents like activated alumina, with aqueous feeds containing organic acids and oxidizers, to adsorb and remove sulfur content from liquid hydrocarbons, allowing continuous processing and reducing sulfur levels from 1500 ppm to below 15 ppm.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If hydro-desulfurization is used to reduce sulfur content, then sulfur removal effectiveness is improved, but operational cost and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur contentVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The desulfurization process is divided into multiple sequential processing units, each containing a reactor assembly and sorption system. This segmentation allows the process to be broken down into manageable stages, improving overall efficiency and reducing time consumption while maintaining effective sulfur removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An aqueous feed containing oxidizer is introduced as an intermediary substance to convert sulfur compounds into oxidized sulfur compounds, which are then more easily adsorbed by the sorbent material. This intermediary step enables faster and more efficient sulfur removal compared to direct hydro-desulfurization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If oxidative desulfurization is used, then processing time is reduced, but reagent cost and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor assembly and sorption system are merged into integrated processing units, where the oxidation reaction and sulfur adsorption occur in a unified system. This integration simplifies operational procedures while maintaining the time-efficient benefits of oxidative desulfurization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The sorbent material is designed to be easily regenerated and reused across multiple processing cycles. This recovery approach reduces operational complexity and reagent consumption, making the oxidative desulfurization process more economically viable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Object-generated harmful factors

If traditional desulfurization methods are used, then sulfur removal is achieved, but operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur contentVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The sorbent material in the sorption system is designed to automatically adsorb oxidized sulfur compounds from the liquid hydrocarbon without requiring additional energy input or complex operational interventions. This self-service mechanism reduces operational costs while maintaining effective sulfur removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The process utilizes ambient or mildly elevated temperatures and pressures, changing the operational parameters from the high temperature and pressure requirements of hydro-desulfurization. This parameter change significantly reduces energy consumption and operational costs while achieving comparable sulfur removal effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system efficiently reduces sulfur content in liquid hydrocarbons to low levels, achieving continuous desulfurization with reduced operational costs and improved process efficiency compared to existing methods.

Implementation Method 1

react the aqueous feed with the sulfur content of the liquid hydrocarbon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

adsorbing at least some of the sulfur content that has reacted with the aqueous feed from the liquid hydrocarbon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 3

shear mixing the liquid hydrocarbon and the aqueous feed within the initial reactor assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear mixing:

Data Source

PatentUS12042748B2System and method for liquid hydrocarbon desulfurization
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 ALTERNATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES SULFEX CORP
  • US12042748B2 patent drawing
  • US12042748B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid hydrocarbon desulfurization system having at least one processing unit, and preferably an initial and an end processing unit. Each processing unit having a reactor assembly and a sorption system. An aqueous system directs aqueous into the reactor assembly together with liquid hydrocarbon, wherein the two are mixed using shear mixers. An adsorbent system provides adsorbent to the sorption column to adsorb the oxidized sulfur resulting through the mixing of the liquid hydrocarbon with the aqueous. A system having multiple processing units is disclosed, as well as systems for transferring adsorbent and providing aqueous. A plurality of methods is likewise disclosed.