Detachable Bicycle Carrier Bracket With Adjustable Struts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional bicycle carrying structures face issues such as weight imbalances, aesthetic detractions, limited adjustability, and inflexibility due to their attachment methods and designs, which hinder operation and compatibility with different bicycle sizes and geometries.

Innovation Solution

A detachable carrier assembly featuring a bracket system attachable to the bicycle's head tube, with segments that can be inserted and detached, supporting a container that can be adjusted in orientation and position, eliminating the need for additional struts and allowing for easy removal without tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If carrying structures are attached to handlebars through multiple strap or clamping systems, then the carrying structure can be secured to the bicycle, but the carrying structure can move in an axial direction along the handlebars as the rider navigates turns and corners

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of carrying structureVSAvoidreliability of attachment
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment system is divided into multiple discrete components: a bracket assembly that attaches to the handlebar, separate support struts that connect to the front wheel fork, and a carrying structure. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function - the bracket provides primary attachment, the struts provide geometric stabilization, and together they create a rigid supported configuration that prevents axial movement while maintaining secure attachment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support struts act as intermediary elements between the carrying structure and the bicycle frame. These struts connect the carrying structure to the front wheel fork, creating a triangular geometric relationship that provides structural stability. The intermediaries (struts) transfer and distribute loads, preventing the carrying structure from moving axially along the handlebars while maintaining reliable attachment through the bracket system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If struts are added to extend from the carrying structure to the front wheel fork for additional support, then the carrying structure gains stability, but the addition of struts detracts from the aesthetics of the bicycle and adds more weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of carrying structureVSAvoidweight of carrying structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The support struts are designed to be removable and adjustable rather than permanent fixed components. This dynamic design allows the struts to be installed only when additional stability is needed, and removed when not required, thereby reducing the overall weight of the moving object (bicycle with carrying structure) while maintaining the capability to provide stability when necessary

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the carrying structure is semi-permanently attached to the bicycle, then the attachment is secure, but the carrying structure can only be removed with hand tools, providing less flexibility in parking, storing and quickly adjusting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of attachmentVSAvoidease of attachment and removal
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The bracket assembly incorporates a quick-release mechanism that allows the carrying structure to be rapidly attached and detached from the handlebar without requiring hand tools. This dynamic attachment system maintains secure attachment when engaged while providing the flexibility to quickly remove or adjust the carrying structure when needed, resolving the contradiction between secure attachment and ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If the carrying structure is fixed in a single setting, then the attachment is simple, but the carrying structure cannot be adjusted to accommodate bicycles having different sizes, geometries, or handlebar shapes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of attachmentVSAvoidadaptability to different bicycles
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The bracket assembly and support strut system are designed with adjustable components that allow the carrying structure to be positioned at multiple locations and orientations. The struts can be adjusted in length and angle, and the bracket can be mounted at different positions on the handlebar, enabling the same basic attachment system to adapt to bicycles of different sizes, geometries, and handlebar shapes while maintaining relatively simple attachment procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10279856B2Detachable carrying assembly
Publication Date: 2019.05.07 MARIN E ALLEN
  • US10279856B2 patent drawing
  • US10279856B2 patent drawing
  • US10279856B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A detachable carrier assembly is provided. The detachable carrier assembly includes a bracket assembly configured for attachment to a head tube of a bicycle and a plurality of segments configured for insertion into the bracket assembly. The plurality of segments is further configured for detachment from the bracket assembly. A container is attached to the plurality of segments. The container is configured to hold a quantity of desired articles.