Detachable Pod Support Stands for Power Plant Enclosures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Power plant systems are vulnerable to accidental damage from collisions with objects like vehicles during transportation and placement, and existing solutions do not adequately address the need for protection and easy repair in the rental market.

Innovation Solution

A support stand with detachable sheet metal pods that project beyond the enclosure to create a crumple zone, providing protection from collisions and allowing easy replacement if damaged, while also enabling compact transportation and flexible adaptation for rental purposes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the power plant enclosure is made more robust to prevent collision damage, then protection is improved, but weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from collision damageVSAvoidweight of power plant system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The protective structure is divided into two segments: a permanent robust enclosure for the power plant system and detachable pod elements that can be attached when protection is needed. This segmentation allows the main system to remain lightweight while providing protection only when required during transportation or rental operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protective enclosure transitions from a static always-protected design to a dynamic system where pods can be attached and detached based on operational needs. The pods are releasably attached to the base, allowing the protection level to change dynamically between transportation mode (protected) and operational mode (unprotected for access).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the power plant system is designed with integrated protection structures, then protection is improved, but ease of repair worsens when damage occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from collision damageVSAvoidrepairability after accidental damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The protective structure is segmented into a permanent base and detachable pod elements. When a pod is damaged, only that specific pod needs to be replaced rather than the entire enclosure, significantly easing repair requirements and reducing downtime for rental operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design accepts that pods may be damaged during operation and facilitates easy replacement of individual pods rather than attempting to repair complex integrated structures. Damaged pods can be quickly removed and replaced with new or spare pods, minimizing operational disruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Ease of repair

If detachable pods are added to the base, then ease of repair is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereplaceability of damaged componentsVSAvoidstructural complexity of support stand
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detachable pods serve multiple functions: they provide collision protection during transportation, can be removed to reduce overall size for storage, and facilitate easy repair by replacing only damaged portions. This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by delivering multiple benefits from a single design feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The pods are designed with standardized attachment mechanisms that create equivalent connection points around the base, allowing any pod to be attached or removed at any location without requiring different attachment methods. This standardization simplifies the overall system despite the added components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

4Area of stationary object

If the stand footprint is reduced for compact transportation, then transportation efficiency is improved, but protection capability worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefootprint of stand during storageVSAvoidprotection from collision damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The protective structure dynamically changes its footprint based on operational state. During storage or transportation when protection is not needed, the pods are removed reducing the footprint to just the base. When transportation or rental operations require protection, the pods are attached to extend the footprint and provide collision protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP1739337B1Support stands for power plants
Publication Date: 2008.08.27 CUMMINS POWER GENERATION LTD
  • EP1739337B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1739337B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP1739337B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A support stand 8 or stand for a power generation plant enclosure 11 comprising a pair of detachable pods 22, 23, which project beyond the edge of the enclosure. The pods protect the enclosure from damage in use, but can be removed for transporting the plant.