Detector Quality Factor Weighting for CT Image Artifact Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In CT imaging systems with a large number of detector channels, the probability of detector channel and Data Acquisition System (DAS) failure or degradation increases, leading to image artifacts and significant degradation in image quality, making it economically unfeasible to replace all failed components.

Innovation Solution

Assigning a quality factor to each detector cell based on its performance, which is used to reconstruct images by weighting error terms in the cost function, allowing for accurate estimation of missing projection samples and integration of detector status into the reconstruction process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the number of detector channels is increased to achieve larger volume coverage, then imaging capability is improved, but the probability of detector channel and DAS failure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolume coverageVSAvoiddetector channel reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of detector channel status by introducing quality factors (Q-factors) that dynamically reflect the operational state of each detector channel. These Q-factors are used to weight the contribution of each channel in the image reconstruction process, allowing the system to adapt to varying detector performances without requiring physical replacement of failed channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If failed detector channels are replaced to maintain image quality, then image quality is improved, but system downtime and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidsystem downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the imaging system to self-correct by using quality factors to automatically compensate for failed or degraded detector channels during the image reconstruction process. The system identifies problematic channels through quality factor assessment and adjusts the reconstruction algorithm to weight neighboring channels higher, thereby maintaining image quality without requiring manual intervention or system shutdown for component replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If all failed detector channels are replaced to eliminate image artifacts, then image quality is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of replacing expensive, complex detector channels and DAS components, the patent uses a software-based approach where quality factors serve as virtual placeholders for failed hardware. This allows the system to continue operating with degraded components by adjusting the reconstruction algorithm, effectively replacing physical replacement with a more economical computational solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS7440602B2Methods, apparatus, and software to compensate for failed or degraded components
Publication Date: 2008.10.21 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US7440602B2 patent drawing
  • US7440602B2 patent drawing
  • US7440602B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for improving images of an imaging system including a plurality of detector cells includes assigning a quality factor for each detector cell.