Radiation Detector Stack Buffering for Thermal Stress Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electromagnetic radiation detection devices face performance discrepancies between simulated and practical implementations, particularly at low temperatures, due to complex stack structures and thermal expansion coefficient mismatches, leading to mechanical stresses and suboptimal electro-optical behavior.

Innovation Solution

A detection device with a buffer layer separating absorbent and optical stacks, each with distinct thermal expansion coefficients, to absorb mechanical stresses and maintain optimal operation, while ensuring the buffer layer does not absorb electromagnetic radiation or conduct electricity, and is configured to manage thermal expansion across the device's temperature range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If cooled detection devices are used to reduce noise components, then detection sensitivity is improved, but thermal expansion coefficient mismatches cause mechanical stresses that worsen performance reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidperformance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A buffer layer is introduced as an intermediary element between the first stack (absorbent layer) and the second stack (optical function layer). This buffer layer has a thermal expansion coefficient that is different from both adjacent layers, specifically positioned between 7×10^-6/K and 13×10^-6/K, to compensate for thermal expansion mismatches during cooling operations, thereby absorbing mechanical stresses and maintaining performance reliability while preserving detection sensitivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If complex stack structures are implemented to achieve optical functions, then detection capability is improved, but manufacturing complexity and development time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidstack structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection device is segmented into distinct functional stacks: a first stack for electromagnetic radiation absorption, a buffer layer for stress management, and a second stack for optical functions. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the manufacturing process by enabling modular assembly, thereby reducing overall device complexity while maintaining enhanced detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of time

If practical implementation follows simulation directly, then development time is reduced, but performance discrepancies between simulation and actual device increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment timeVSAvoidperformance accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The buffer layer is designed and positioned in advance during the stacking process, before final assembly and cooling operations. Its thermal expansion properties are pre-calculated and selected to compensate for expected thermal stresses, allowing the device to achieve simulation-predicted performance from the first practical implementation, thereby reducing iterative development time while ensuring manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances the detection device's performance by reducing mechanical stresses, improving repeatability, and maintaining homogenous stress conditions across photodetectors, thereby aligning with simulated expectations and maintaining optimal operation even at low temperatures.

Implementation Method 1

the first thermal expansion coefficient is different from the second thermal expansion coefficient and in that it comprises a buffer layer separating the first stack and the second stack, the buffer layer presenting a thickness comprised between 0.5 μm and 50 μm so as to absorb the mechanical stresses induced by the first stack

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 2

buffer layer... so as to absorb the mechanical stresses induced by the first stack

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

an absorbent first stack configured to absorb an electromagnetic radiation in at least a first wavelength range

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11869905B2Electromagnetic radiation detection device
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 LYNRED
  • US11869905B2 patent drawing
  • US11869905B2 patent drawing
  • US11869905B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A detection device includes an absorbent first stack configured to absorb an electromagnetic radiation in at least a first wavelength range and presenting a first thermal expansion coefficient. It also includes a second stack forming an optical function and presenting a second thermal expansion coefficient. The first thermal expansion coefficient is different from the second thermal expansion coefficient and the detection device further includes a buffer layer separating the first stack and the second stack. The buffer layer presents a thickness included between 0.5 μm and 50 μm so as to absorb the mechanical stresses induced by the first stack.