Location Tracking in Detention Environments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Detention environments face inaccuracies and delays in tracking the location of individuals, leading to denied access to communication terminals and increased administrative burdens, as manual updates often mismatch with actual locations, causing residents to miss communications with family and friends.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that automatically updates an individual's location by using a combination of initial and secondary authentications, such as a PIN and biometric identification, to ensure accurate access to restricted communications terminals, thereby synchronizing location information and reducing manual errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual location updates are used in legacy systems, then facility staff can maintain location records, but location accuracy deteriorates and access denials occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation tracking reliabilityVSAvoidtime delay in location updates
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-updating of location records through terminal usage. When a resident uses a communication terminal, the system automatically detects their location and updates the legacy system without requiring manual intervention from facility staff, thereby eliminating time delays and improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where terminal usage information is continuously fed back to the legacy location tracking system. This feedback mechanism ensures that location records are automatically synchronized with actual resident positions, eliminating discrepancies caused by manual update delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If manual location updates are performed, then facility staff can maintain records, but location precision deteriorates causing access denials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation recording precisionVSAvoidmanual update process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically captures and records location data through terminal usage without requiring manual input from facility staff. The terminal itself serves as the recording device, eliminating human error and improving precision while simplifying the operational process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical updating processes with automated electronic detection and recording mechanisms. Terminal usage automatically triggers location recording in the legacy system, substituting human operations with automated digital processes that provide more precise and reliable location data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If automatic location tracking is implemented, then location accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation tracking reliabilityVSAvoidauthentication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system is segmented into distinct phases: initial authentication to establish identity, and secondary authentication to verify location authorization. This segmentation allows each phase to be independently managed and simplified, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high reliability through multiple verification steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8903060B2Individual location tracking in detention environments
Publication Date: 2014.12.02 INTELMATE LLC
  • US8903060B2 patent drawing
  • US8903060B2 patent drawing
  • US8903060B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for permitting a log in to a restricted access communications terminal are provided. In one aspect, a method includes receiving a request from a user to access a communications terminal, the request including a first authentication provided by the user, and verifying the first authentication provided by the user. The method also includes identifying the user based on the verified first authentication, determining, based on an actual location of the communications terminal, that the user is restricted from accessing the communications terminal, and requesting a second authentication from the user when the user is attempting to access the communications terminal from an unauthorized or undocumented location. The method further includes receiving the second authentication from the user, verifying the second authentication provided by the user, and providing access to the user to the communications terminal based on the verified second authentication. Systems, terminals, and machine-readable media are also provided.