Detergent Surfactant System Viscosity and Cost Trade-off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Liquid detergent compositions with high surfactant levels appear thick and of high quality, while those with lower surfactant levels appear runny, leading to perceived lower performance and cost inefficiencies due to the use of thickeners that do not provide performance benefits.

Innovation Solution

Formulating liquid detergent compositions with a surfactant system comprising alkyl ethoxylated sulfate surfactant (AES) and linear alkyl benzene sulfonate surfactant (LAS), where the AES has an average alkyl chain length of 13.9 to 14.6 carbon atoms and an average degree of ethoxylation of 1 to 5, to internally build viscosity and enhance performance without the need for external thickeners.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If the surfactant level is increased to improve perceived quality and viscosity, then the pouring experience and perceived performance improve, but the cost of the composition increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveviscosityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the surfactant system by specifying AES with 13.9 to 14.6 carbon atoms and 1 to 5 degrees of ethoxylation, creating a synergistic system with LAS that generates viscosity through molecular interactions rather than requiring high concentrations or external thickeners

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite surfactant system combining AES and LAS in specific ratios, where the interaction between these two different surfactant types produces viscosity enhancement that neither surfactant would achieve alone at the same concentration levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Shape

If external thickeners are added to increase viscosity, then the pouring experience improves, but the cost increases without performance benefit

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveviscosityVSAvoidcost efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The surfactant system serves itself by generating viscosity through the inherent synergistic interactions between AES and LAS molecules, eliminating the need for external thickeners that would add cost without providing cleaning performance benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composition achieves a desirable viscosity and performance benefits while maintaining cost efficiency, providing a luxurious pouring experience and perceived high-quality performance without the added cost of thickeners.

Implementation Method 1

the surfactant system including alkyl ethoxylated sulfate surfactant (AES) and linear alkyl benzene sulfonate surfactant (LAS)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurfactant: Surfactant

Data Source

PatentUS11447726B2Detergent compositions having surfactant systems
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • US11447726B2 patent drawing
  • US11447726B2 patent drawing
  • US11447726B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Detergent compositions having surfactant systems that include alkyl ethoxylated sulfate surfactant (AES) and linear alkyl benzene sulfonate surfactant (LAS). Methods of treating fabric with such compositions.