Deterministic Decision Support Algorithm for Airport Security Wait Times

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for evaluating wait times and queue lengths at multi-station and multi-stage screening zones in airport security logistics lack predictive analytics and operational insights, leading to inefficiencies and potential security risks due to overwhelmed security agents.

Innovation Solution

A deterministic decision support algorithm and Visual Analytics and Decision Support System (VADSS) platform that predicts wait times and queue lengths by integrating mechanistic, machine learning, and time series models to optimize staffing and resource allocation at Security Screening Checkpoints (SSCPs), using data from multiple sources to forecast passenger arrivals and dynamically adjust checkpoint configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional manual evaluation methods are used for wait times and queue lengths, then system simplicity is maintained, but predictive analytics capability and operational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive analytics capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the security screening process into multiple stages (Travel Document Check, primary screening, secondary screening) with multiple stations at each stage. This segmentation allows for granular measurement and prediction of wait times and queue lengths at each specific stage, enabling precise predictive analytics while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a deterministic decision support algorithm as an intermediary between raw operational data and decision-making. This algorithm processes data from multiple sources (mechanistic models, machine learning, time series) and translates it into actionable predictions about wait times and queue lengths, bridging the gap between complex data and simple operational decisions without requiring the entire system to become unnecessarily complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If more security agents are deployed to reduce wait times, then service quality improves, but operational cost and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewait timeVSAvoidstaffing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic staffing recommendations that adjust the number and placement of security agents based on real-time and forecasted passenger flow conditions. Rather than static over-staffing, the deterministic algorithm continuously optimizes agent deployment to match actual demand patterns, reducing wait times when needed while minimizing unnecessary staffing during low-demand periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of staffing levels from fixed to variable based on predictive analytics. The system uses multiple modeling approaches (mechanistic, machine learning, time series) to forecast passenger arrivals and dynamically adjusts staffing parameters accordingly, allowing the organization to respond optimally to changing conditions without committing to excessive baseline staffing levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If deterministic algorithms are used for predictions, then prediction accuracy and reliability improve, but adaptability to uncertain future conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidadaptability to future conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The deterministic decision support algorithm performs preliminary actions by forecasting future passenger flow conditions using multiple modeling approaches before decisions need to be made. By predicting wait times and queue lengths in advance with high reliability, the system enables proactive staffing and resource allocation decisions that adapt to future conditions before they actually occur, combining deterministic reliability with forward-looking adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where prediction accuracy is continuously monitored and used to refine the deterministic algorithms. The integration of multiple modeling approaches (mechanistic, machine learning, time series) creates a feedback-rich environment where the system learns from past predictions and actual outcomes, improving both reliability and adaptability over time through iterative refinement based on observed performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20220092442A1Systems, methods, and apparatuses for evaluating wait times and queue lengths at multi-station and multi-stage screening zones via a determinisitc decision support algorithm
Publication Date: 2022.03.24 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US20220092442A1 patent drawing
  • US20220092442A1 patent drawing
  • US20220092442A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with embodiments disclosed herein, there are provided herein systems, methods, and apparatuses for predicting and evaluating wait times and queue lengths at multi-station and multi-stage screening zones via a deterministic decision support algorithm and complementary prediction model. For example, there is disclosed in accordance with a particular embodiment, a specially configured Visual Analytics and Decision Support System platform (VADSS platform), having means by which to model, predict, and evaluate airport security wait times. Additionally described in accordance with various embodiments is a workforce allocation and configuration decision system for airport security checkpoints (e.g., number of lanes open) based on passenger volume forecasts. The accuracy of such forecasts is critical for the smooth functioning of security checkpoints where unexpected surges in passenger volumes are handled proactively. Thus, the described forecasting model combines flight schedules and other business fundamentals with historically observed throughput patterns to predict passenger volumes in a multi-terminal multi-security screening checkpoint airport. Additionally disclosed is an optimization model and a solution strategy for dynamically selecting a configuration of open screening lanes to minimize passenger queues and wait times that at the same time determine workforce allocations.