Electronic Detonator Blaster Flight Recovery After Command Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic detonator blasters face challenges such as unstable charging due to magnetic oscillation-type booster circuits, material non-uniformity issues during mass production, and difficulties in efficient wireless communication without Line of Sight, which can lead to accidents and equipment loss during recovery.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method for an electronic detonator blaster with an integrated flight function, where a flying vehicle is controlled to ascend to a preset altitude and land at a preset return point after completing a blasting command transmission, with features such as magnetic or busbar connection release, flight path generation for low battery scenarios, and distress notification systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If a magnetic oscillation-type booster circuit is used to charge the capacitor for detonation, then the electrical energy for detonation can be achieved, but the circuit stability deteriorates due to supply voltage changes and other conditions causing oscillation stopping or overcurrent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical energy for detonationVSAvoidcircuit stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental operating parameters of the booster circuit by transitioning from a magnetic oscillation-type circuit to a voltage reversal-type circuit. This parameter change eliminates the instability issues associated with magnetic oscillation while maintaining the capability to generate sufficient detonation energy through controlled voltage reversal and capacitor charging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the magnetic field-based oscillation mechanism with an electrical voltage reversal mechanism. By substituting the magnetic oscillation system with a direct electrical control system using voltage reversal, the invention achieves more stable and controllable capacitor charging for detonation purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Use of energy by moving object

If a magnetic oscillation-type booster circuit is used, then the capacitor can be charged with sufficient energy, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to non-uniformity of core material and coil turns during mass production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging energyVSAvoidcore material uniformity and coil turns
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the magnetic oscillation mechanism requiring precise core material and coil construction with a voltage reversal electrical control system. This substitution eliminates the manufacturing precision requirements for magnetic components while maintaining the ability to charge the capacitor with sufficient energy for detonation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the fundamental charging mechanism from magnetic oscillation to voltage reversal, thereby changing the critical parameters from magnetic component specifications (core material uniformity, coil turns) to electrical control parameters that are easier to standardize and control during mass production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the electronic detonator blaster approaches the blasting area for recovery, then the blaster can be retrieved, but the safety deteriorates due to unstable ground conditions, blasting vibration, or flying stone causing accidents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery operationVSAvoidground instability, blasting vibration, flying stone
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a flying vehicle as an intermediary carrier to transport the electronic detonator blaster. This intermediary allows the blaster to be positioned at the blasting area and recovered without human operators being physically present on the unstable ground, thereby eliminating exposure to ground instability, blasting vibration, and flying stone hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical transport method (human-carrying or ground-based vehicle) with an aerial flying vehicle system. This substitution eliminates the need for physical contact with the unstable ground and hazardous blasting environment during recovery operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of information

If a fixed repeater is installed on the ground to improve wireless communication, then the communication efficiency improves when LoS is not established, but the device complexity increases and it is difficult to select and operate the repeater location

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewireless communication efficiencyVSAvoidrepeater installation and location selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static fixed repeater system into a dynamic mobile communication system using the flying vehicle. The flying vehicle can dynamically position itself to establish Line of Sight communication paths as needed, eliminating the need for fixed ground-based repeater installations and complex location selection procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The flying vehicle serves multiple functions: it carries the electronic detonator blaster, provides aerial transport, and acts as a mobile communication relay when needed. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate fixed repeater infrastructure, reducing system complexity while maintaining communication efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the safety and efficiency of electronic detonator blaster operations by preventing damage from blasting impacts, improving recovery rates, and reducing the risk of accidents during recovery, while also addressing communication inefficiencies through integrated flight control and notification systems.

Implementation Method 1

a flying vehicle capable of being flown and controlled by induction of radio waves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInduction of radio waves: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12287649B2Apparatus and method for operating electronic detonator blaster with integrated flight function
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 HANWHA CORP
  • US12287649B2 patent drawing
  • US12287649B2 patent drawing
  • US12287649B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Proposed are an apparatus and a method for operating an electronic detonator blaster with an integrated flight function. The apparatus includes a blasting command transmission part configured to transmit a blasting command to each of electronic detonators which are combined with a flying vehicle capable of being flown and controlled by induction of radio waves and are connected to each other, a connection control part configured to release the connection of the flying vehicle with the electronic detonators when the transmission of the blasting command is completed, and a flight control part configured to control the flying vehicle to land at a preset return point after ascending to a preset altitude when the connection of the flying vehicle with the electronic detonators is completely released.