Detonator Wire Resistance Alteration via Electromagnetic Joule Heating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing explosive detonator systems pose challenges in controlled deactivation or reduction of performance characteristics, especially in environments where accidental or intentional detonation is a risk, due to their sensitive nature and potential for unstable mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

The method involves directing electromagnetic energy at the detonator's wire to cause Joule heating, reducing its electrical transmission capability by altering its resistance, effectively diminishing the detonator's performance without physical contact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electromagnetic energy is directed at the detonator wire to cause Joule heating, then the electrical transmission capability of the wire is reduced, but the risk of accidental detonation increases due to thermal effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetonator performance reductionVSAvoidaccidental detonation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling electromagnetic pulse parameters (voltage, current, pulse width, frequency) to achieve controlled Joule heating that reduces wire electrical transmission capability without causing detonation. The system adjusts these parameters to stay within safe thermal margins while effectively diminishing detonator performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by monitoring the electrical transmission capability of the detonator wire during the electromagnetic pulse application process. This feedback allows the system to adjust the electromagnetic energy delivery in real-time, ensuring the wire's transmission capability is reduced to the desired level without exceeding thermal thresholds that would cause accidental detonation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If physical contact methods are used to deactivate detonators, then direct manipulation is possible, but safety risks increase due to handling sensitive explosive devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetonator deactivation capabilityVSAvoidsafety risk during handling
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical contact-based deactivation methods with electromagnetic field-based methods. By using electromagnetic pulses to induce Joule heating in the detonator wire, the system achieves detonator deactivation without requiring physical contact or manual handling of the sensitive explosive device, thereby eliminating the safety risks associated with direct manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces electromagnetic energy as an intermediary medium to transfer energy to the detonator wire. Instead of direct physical contact, the electromagnetic field serves as the mediator that delivers the necessary energy to alter the wire's electrical transmission capability, enabling safe remote deactivation of the detonator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If high electromagnetic fluence is applied to ensure wire resistance change, then detonator effectiveness is reduced, but the complexity of controlling pulse parameters increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire resistance alterationVSAvoidpulse parameter control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages parameter control complexity by systematically varying electromagnetic pulse parameters (voltage, current, pulse width, frequency) within defined ranges to achieve the desired wire resistance change. The system employs parameter optimization techniques to identify effective parameter combinations that reliably alter wire resistance while maintaining controlled complexity in the pulse generation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for controlled reduction of detonator performance, enhancing safety by minimizing the risk of accidental or intentional detonation, and enabling safer handling and management of explosive devices.

Implementation Method 1

Continuing direction of the electromagnetic energy at the detonator at a fluence or flow rate, frequency, and duration sufficient to cause Joule heating of a wire within the detonator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9448042B2Diminishing detonator effectiveness through electromagnetic effects
Publication Date: 2016.09.20 BOARD OF RGT NEVADA SYST OF HIGHER EDUCATION ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF NEVADA RENO
  • US9448042B2 patent drawing
  • US9448042B2 patent drawing
  • US9448042B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inductively coupled transmission line with distributed electromotive force source and an alternative coupling model based on empirical data and theory were developed to initiate bridge wire melt for a detonator with an open and a short circuit detonator load. In the latter technique, the model was developed to exploit incomplete knowledge of the open circuited detonator using tendencies common to all of the open circuit loads examined. Military, commercial, and improvised detonators were examined and modeled. Nichrome, copper, platinum, and tungsten are the detonator specific bridge wire materials studied. The improvised detonators were made typically made with tungsten wire and copper (˜40 AWG wire strands) wire.