Developing Blade Surface Roughness for Toner Layer Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing developing apparatuses using magnetic mono-component developers face issues with excessive toner conveyance, leading to uneven image density, fogged images, and streaks due to unstable toner layers and clogging of external additive agents, which are difficult to address through conventional surface roughness regulation methods.

Innovation Solution

The development of a developing apparatus with a conductive resin layer on the developing sleeve and a surface roughened developing blade, featuring specific surface roughness parameters such as Ra, Rz, Rpk, and A2, to regulate toner layer thickness and prevent clogging, thereby stabilizing the toner layer and reducing streak images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conglobated toner with high sphericity is used, then electrostatic charge amount per weight increases and dot image reproducibility improves, but toner conveyance amount increases excessively causing uneven image density and fogged images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedot image reproducibilityVSAvoidtoner conveyance amount
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the surface roughness parameters of the developing blade (specifically Rz between 3.0-15.0 μm and Rpk between 1.0-5.0 μm) to control toner conveyance. This changes the physical interaction between the blade surface and conglobated toner particles, reducing excessive conveyance while maintaining dot image reproducibility achieved through high-sphericity toner design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating specific surface structures (peaks and valleys) on the developing blade at the contact portion with the developing sleeve. The localized surface roughness parameters (Rz, Rpk) are optimized to provide differential interaction: the valley portions trap excess toner while peak portions maintain controlled conveyance, addressing the uniformity issue across the entire toner layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If toner conveyance amount increases, then more toner is supplied to developing region, but electrostatic charge imparted becomes insufficient causing fogged images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoner supply amountVSAvoidelectrostatic charge uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the surface roughness parameters of the developing blade to optimize the balance between toner supply and charging efficiency. By controlling Rz and Rpk within specific ranges, the blade surface provides adequate friction for charging while preventing excessive toner accumulation that would lead to insufficient charge per particle and fogged images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional surface roughness regulation methods are used, then toner layer thickness can be regulated, but external additive agents become clogged causing streak images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoner layer thickness uniformityVSAvoidstreak images from additive clogging
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating between valley portions and peak portions of the blade surface. The valley portions (with depth controlled by Rz and Rpk parameters) selectively trap external additive agents released from toner particles, while the peak portions maintain smooth toner conveyance. This localized function separation prevents additive clogging from propagating as streaks across the image while preserving toner layer uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of external additive agent release into a beneficial function by designing the blade surface valleys to actively trap and retain these additives. The additives that would otherwise cause streaking are captured in the valley portions, preventing their harmful deposition on the photosensitive member while the peak portions ensure uniform toner transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Manufacturing precision

If developing blade abuts on developing sleeve, then toner layer thickness is regulated, but toner conveyance becomes unstable leading to uneven image density

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoner layer thickness controlVSAvoidtoner conveyance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent stabilizes toner conveyance by optimizing the surface roughness parameters (Rz: 3.0-15.0 μm, Rpk: 1.0-5.0 μm) of the developing blade. These parameter changes create a balanced interaction between the blade and toner particles, providing sufficient friction for stable conveyance while preventing excessive grip that would cause variability in toner layer thickness and image density uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively suppresses streak images and ensures stable toner layer thickness, even with high-circularity toner, by enhancing conveyance resistivity and preventing external additive agent clogging, resulting in improved image quality and extended apparatus longevity.

Implementation Method 1

a magnetic field generating unit (magnet roller) having a plurality of securely arranged magnetic poles. The magnetic toner is adsorbed onto the developing sleeve by the magnetic field generated by the magnetic field generating unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

a magnetic mono-component developer (magnetic toner) is carried on a developing sleeve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Implementation Method 3

a developer regulating member that abuts on the developing sleeve... a blade-shaped member formed generally by an elastic body... surface roughness parameters such as Ra, Rz, Rpk, and A2, to regulate toner layer thickness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 4

forms an electrostatic image (latent image) by irradiating an electrophotographic photosensitive member (photosensitive member) with a light corresponding to image data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic induction: Electrostatic Induction

Implementation Method 5

a developing bias voltage composed of alternating current and direct current components, for example, is applied to the developing sleeve. As a result, an electric potential is generated between the electrostatic image on the photosensitive member and the developing sleeve. Thereby, toner is moved to the electrostatic image to perform a development

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS7650104B2Developing apparatus including developer carrying member and developer regulating member with surface roughness parameters
Publication Date: 2010.01.19 CANON KK
  • US7650104B2 patent drawing
  • US7650104B2 patent drawing
  • US7650104B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A developing apparatus includes: a developing sleeve that carries a mono-component developer; and a developing blade that abuts on the sleeve to regulate a layer thickness of the developer on the sleeve, wherein surface roughness parameters of the sleeve satisfy: 3.0≦Rpk≦9.0; and 2≦Pc2≦10. At an abutment portion between the sleeve and the blade, surface roughness parameters of the blade satisfy: 0.030≦Sm≦0.170; and 0.10≦Rvk×(100−Mr2)/100≦1.30, where Sm is a mean spacing of profile irregularities [mm]; Rpk is an initial wear height [μm]; Rvk is an oil retaining depth [μm]; Mr2 is a profile bearing length ratio 2 [%]; and Pc2 denotes the number of profile peaks having a height larger than a count level from a center line per the evaluation length of 1 mm.