Device for spraying a liquid at distance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for spraying liquids on high surfaces like roofs and facades require expensive and safety-risking scaffolding, and existing remote spraying devices are costly for small areas and lack ease of use and safety.

Innovation Solution

A device with a flexible conduit connecting a spray nozzle on a pole to a reservoir, featuring a steerable carriage with remotely operable wheels or caterpillars, allowing for variable orientation and easy maneuverability, and a remote control system for independent operation of the spraying mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If scaffolding is used to reach high surfaces for spraying, then the spraying capability on high surfaces is achieved, but the cost increases and safety risks arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespraying capability on high surfacesVSAvoidcost and safety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device segments the spraying system into a handheld pole unit and a separate carriage with spray nozzle, connected by a flexible conduit. This allows the user to remain on the ground while the nozzle reaches high surfaces, eliminating the need for scaffolding and associated safety risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible conduit acts as an intermediary, transmitting liquid from the ground-level reservoir to the high-positioned spray nozzle. This mediator enables spraying at height without requiring the operator to physically reach those heights, thus avoiding scaffolding costs and safety concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If a rigid pole with nozzle is used for spraying, then the device is simple, but the radius of action is limited to maximum 6 meters from the ground

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice simplicityVSAvoidradius of action
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The device replaces the static rigid pole with a dynamic system featuring a steerable carriage that can move independently on tracks. This allows the spray nozzle to reach areas beyond the limited 6-meter radius by moving the carriage along the track structure, while the user remains on the ground.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds a horizontal movement dimension through the carriage traveling on tracks, complementing the vertical reach of the extended pole. This two-dimensional movement capability (vertical extension + horizontal carriage movement) vastly expands the effective spraying radius beyond the original 6-meter limitation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If lifting means such as crane are used for remote spraying, then roofs of great height and large surface area can be treated, but the cost becomes expensive especially for small areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment capability of high large areasVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the expensive lifting means (crane) from the system and replaces it with a simple track-based carriage system that can be manually or lightly powered. This extraction eliminates the high cost associated with crane rental or operation, making the device economically viable for small areas while still capable of treating high surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The device employs inexpensive, simple components such as the track-mounted carriage and manual steering mechanism instead of expensive, complex lifting equipment. These simpler, cheaper components achieve the same functional goal of reaching high surfaces without the high operational costs of crane-based systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Device complexity

If the carriage is manually steered for remote spraying, then the device is light and easy to use, but the orientation control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice weight and ease of useVSAvoidorientation control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces complex electronic or hydraulic steering systems with a simple mechanical steering mechanism operated by the user. This mechanical system, while simple, provides adequate orientation control for the carriage on the track, maintaining ease of use without sacrificing directional control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3031533B1Device for spraying a liquid at distance
Publication Date: 2017.10.25 PERCHE BEKY
  • EP3031533B1 patent drawing
  • EP3031533B1 patent drawing
  • EP3031533B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Device for spraying liquid, at a distance from the user, comprising at least one spray nozzle arranged at a first end of a pole, the second end of which is held by the user, the nozzle being connected, via from a flexible conduit, to a reservoir of liquid to be sprayed, the device comprising a carriage on which the nozzle is fixed, the carriage being provided with steerable displacement means (such as two wheels or caterpillars), and the device comprising means for maneuvering the orientation of the wheels, the maneuvering means being operable remotely by the user, from the second end of the pole by which the latter holds the pole, by pivoting the second end of the pole, the means maneuvering the orientation of the wheels including a gear transmission system connecting the first end of the pole to said carriage.