Device Identification Chip Banning Malicious Access
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current cybersecurity measures rely heavily on user authentication, which is insufficient in preventing cybercriminals from engaging in malicious activities without incurring financial damages.
Innovation Solution
Implementing a punitive cybersecurity system that bans Internet access for identified malicious communication devices, creating and updating a banned Device Identification (DI) list to financially penalize cybercriminals and cyberterrorists.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If user authentication is used for cybersecurity protection, then access control is improved, but cybercriminals can still engage in malicious activities without incurring financial damages
Solution Approach 1:
The system preemptively bans communication devices by adding their device identification information to a banned list before they can engage in malicious activities. This preliminary action prevents cybercriminals from using stolen devices without requiring authentication, as the device itself is blocked from accessing the network
Solution Approach 2:
The system converts the harmful factor of stolen communication devices into a benefit by using the device identification information to automatically ban these devices. The very characteristic that allows stolen devices to be used (their unique identification) becomes the mechanism for their automatic detection and banning, financially penalizing cybercriminals
2Object-generated harmful factors
If a banned DI list is implemented to ban malicious devices, then punitive damages are imposed on cybercriminals, but device complexity and system requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs automatic banning operations without requiring manual intervention. The control system automatically detects device identification information, checks it against the banned list, and adds new devices to the banned list when malicious activity is detected, eliminating the need for manual list management and reducing operational complexity
Solution Approach 2:
The banned DI list serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as an authentication mechanism, a punitive measure against cybercriminals, and a preventive security layer. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems for each purpose, thereby managing complexity while achieving multiple security objectives
Data Source
AI summary
A DI (device identification) chip, smartphone, communication device, system, method, or operating method is rendered capable of imposing punitive damages to cybercriminals and cyberterrorisms. Comprised are operating instructions for building a DI database, setting specified DI information required, formatting DI packet, and transmitting the DI packet for verification. The DI database may comprise a banned DI list and/or a DI-Member-Only list. The punitive measure in conjunction with the banned DI list will render a cybercriminal's communication device incapable of gaining access to the Internet, and its operating system invalid, once registered in the banned DI list. Accordingly, for the first time, no cybercriminal/cyberterrorism can proceed with any cybercrime at no cost. Equally unique is the DI-Member-Only list that will allow a central server to be accessible only to the communication devices with the DI information preregistered, thus precluding any potential cyberattack from unknown communication devices also for the first time.