Device Management Apparatus Proactive SLA Fulfillment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing device management systems fail to proactively address non-fulfillment of Service Level Agreements (SLA) by only reporting after the fact, lacking the ability to expand report targets in real-time based on device operation status, which can lead to missed maintenance opportunities and increased maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

A device management apparatus and system that includes a receiving unit for state information, a sending unit for report information, and a changing unit that dynamically expands report targets when the device's operation state does not meet scheduled standards, identified through historical state information analysis, allowing for proactive maintenance and improved SLA fulfillment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system only reports device state changes after they occur, then the reporting process remains simple and straightforward, but the system cannot proactively address SLA non-fulfillment or expand report targets in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSLA fulfillment rateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of device operation status against SLA requirements before non-fulfillment occurs. By continuously monitoring and comparing current operation status with scheduled standards, the system can proactively identify potential SLA violations and expand report targets in advance, rather than merely reporting after problems occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the analysis results of device operation status are fed back to dynamically adjust report targets. When the system detects that operation status deviates from scheduled standards, it automatically expands the scope of reporting, creating a closed-loop control system that continuously improves SLA fulfillment through adaptive feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If the system expands report targets dynamically based on operation status, then proactive maintenance is enabled, but the complexity of determining report targets increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance response timeVSAvoidreport target determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes the relationship between operation status parameters and report target expansion criteria. By having predetermined rules and thresholds for when and how to expand report targets, the system can quickly respond to status changes without complex real-time decision-making, reducing maintenance response time while maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically determines when to expand report targets by autonomously comparing device operation status against scheduled standards and applying predefined expansion rules. This self-service capability eliminates the need for manual intervention in target determination, reducing both response time and operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If the system monitors and analyzes historical state information continuously, then operation status can be accurately identified, but the computational load and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation status identification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the critical state information and operation status parameters that are necessary for SLA evaluation from the complete historical state data. By selectively extracting relevant information rather than processing all available data, the system maintains high measurement precision for operation status identification while reducing computational load and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial monitoring and analysis to historical state information, focusing on key parameters and time periods most relevant to SLA fulfillment assessment. This selective approach provides sufficient accuracy for operational status identification without the excessive computational burden of analyzing every detail of historical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9875479B2Device management apparatus, device management system, and information processing method
Publication Date: 2018.01.23 RICOH CO LTD
  • US9875479B2 patent drawing
  • US9875479B2 patent drawing
  • US9875479B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device management apparatus including a receiving unit configured to receive state information indicating a change in a state of a device and store the state information in a state information storage unit; a sending unit configured to send report information relating to the state information to a predetermined destination, when the state information received by the receiving unit corresponds to a report target; and a changing unit configured to expand the report targets when an operation state of the device does not fulfill a scheduled state of a present time point, the operation state being identified based on history of the state information stored in the state information storage unit.