Device Profile Comparison for Configuration Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users of computing devices face difficulties in configuring hardware and software components effectively due to the numerous customization options available, leading to confusion and potential performance issues, as modifications can either enhance or hinder the performance of different software applications.

Innovation Solution

A system where a computing device sends a filtered device profile to a server, which compares it with other profiles to identify similar devices, determines configuration differences, and provides recommendations for optimization, including software, hardware, and peripheral upgrades, that can be automatically implemented or suggested to the user.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If users modify configuration of hardware components and software applications to optimize performance, then task execution speed is improved, but device complexity and user confusion increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution speedVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically analyzes device profiles, compares them with similar devices, and generates optimization recommendations without requiring deep user intervention. The device serves itself by collecting usage data, identifying configuration issues, and presenting actionable recommendations to users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously collects device profile data including hardware configuration, software applications, and usage patterns. This feedback loop allows the system to understand actual device behavior and provide targeted configuration recommendations based on observed usage rather than theoretical optimizations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If users make configuration modifications to speed up tasks, then productivity is improved, but reliability and potential performance issues worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion rateVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates device profiles that capture the complete configuration state of computing devices. By comparing profiles across multiple devices, the system identifies configuration patterns that lead to successful task execution while maintaining system stability, effectively copying proven configurations to similar devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of device profiles and potential configuration changes before recommending modifications. By evaluating the impact of proposed changes on system reliability and comparing with similar successful configurations, the system ensures that recommendations maintain stability while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive device profiles are collected for analysis, then recommendation accuracy is improved, but data processing requirements and system resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusage profile accuracyVSAvoiddata processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant features from comprehensive device profiles for comparison and analysis. Instead of processing entire device configurations, it identifies and extracts key usage patterns, hardware specifications, and software application data that are most predictive of performance optimization opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system collects more data than initially necessary to ensure comprehensive coverage of usage scenarios, then applies filtering and aggregation to reduce the data volume for processing. This approach ensures no important usage patterns are missed while managing data processing requirements through selective analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10599538B2Usage profile based recommendations
Publication Date: 2020.03.24 DELL PROD LP
  • US10599538B2 patent drawing
  • US10599538B2 patent drawing
  • US10599538B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A server may receive a device profile from a computing device. The device profile may identify a usage of at least software applications associated with the computing device. The server may perform a comparison of the device profile with other device profiles associated with other computing devices, determine a similarity index of the device profile with individual ones of the other device profiles, and select a subset of the other device profiles based on the similarity index to create a set of similar device profiles. The server may determine configuration differences between the device profile of the computing device and individual device profiles of the similar device profiles, determine recommendations based on the configuration differences, and send the recommendations to the computing device. Implementing one or more of the recommendations may cause the one or more tasks to execute faster or use less of one or more computing resources.