Device Profile Validation for Automated Attack Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current authentication mechanisms struggle to effectively differentiate between human and automated machine requests in web-based interactions, leading to vulnerabilities in protecting online resources from automated attacks.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that verifies user devices by receiving a validation request from a second user device, determining its validity based on device profiles, and granting access to online resources, with the option to provide a CAPTCHA challenge if validation fails, ensuring human interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional authentication mechanisms are used, then user access is granted, but automated machine requests cannot be effectively differentiated from human requests

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidverification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication process is segmented into multiple independent validation checks: device profile analysis, CAPTCHA challenge, and behavioral biometrics. Each segment evaluates specific aspects of user identity separately, then combines results for comprehensive authentication. This modular approach improves reliability without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A verification system acts as an intermediary between the user device and the online resource. This intermediary evaluates device profiles, issues CAPTCHA challenges, and analyzes behavioral patterns before granting access. The intermediary layer filters automated requests while allowing legitimate human users through, resolving the contradiction between security and accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If sophisticated authentication mechanisms are implemented, then automated attacks are blocked, but user trust and comfort may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated attack preventionVSAvoiduser interaction simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial verification actions based on risk assessment. For low-risk requests from recognized devices, only lightweight device profile validation is performed. For suspicious requests, additional CAPTCHA challenges or behavioral biometrics are triggered. This graduated approach blocks automated attacks while minimizing friction for legitimate users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The verification system incorporates self-service elements where users can pre-register device profiles and behavioral patterns. Once registered, the system automatically recognizes and validates these profiles without requiring repeated manual verification. This reduces the number of CAPTCHA challenges users must complete while maintaining strong automated attack prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If device validation is performed, then access control is improved, but processing time and system resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control reliabilityVSAvoidverification processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Device profiles and behavioral biometrics are collected and validated in advance during initial device registration. The system pre-evaluates device characteristics, operating systems, and user interaction patterns before actual authentication is needed. This preliminary action creates a baseline for rapid comparison during subsequent login attempts, reducing real-time processing time while maintaining high access control reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The verification system dynamically adjusts validation parameters based on device type, user history, and request context. For mobile devices with pre-validated profiles, the system uses faster heuristic evaluation. For desktop devices or first-time users, more thorough multi-factor validation is applied. This parameter adaptation optimizes processing time while maintaining consistent security standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3378214B1Controlling access to online resources using device validations
Publication Date: 2020.10.14 GOOGLE LLC
  • EP3378214B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3378214B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3378214B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methods of verifying a user are provided. In particular, a request to engage in a verification process to gain access to an online resource can be received. The request can be provided by a first user device associated with a user. A validation request associated with a second user device associated with the user can be received. The validation request can include a device profile associated with the second user device. It can then be determined whether to validate the second user device based at least in part on the device profile. When it is determined to validate the second user device, the first user device can be granted access to the online resource.