Device Resource Negotiation Protocol for Opportunistic Borrowing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for resource sharing among devices do not effectively address the need for opportunistic enhancement of device functionality by accessing heterogeneous resources from other devices within a trusted group, nor do they consider security aspects and incentives for resource negotiation.

Innovation Solution

A peer-to-peer negotiation protocol that enables a requesting device to orchestrate the execution of a negotiation protocol to access resources on a remote device within a trusted group, using a ranking system to select the best responding device based on performance, reliability, and connection quality, and incorporating an incentive scheme to reward participating devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If devices share resources within trusted groups, then device functionality and performance are improved, but security risks and trust management complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice functionalityVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a resource negotiation protocol that acts as an intermediary between requesting and providing devices. This protocol mediates the resource sharing process by establishing secure contracts, verifying device identities, and managing trust relationships, thereby enabling functionality enhancement while maintaining security through structured negotiation mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes trust parameters and negotiation terms based on device conditions. Trust levels, resource allocation amounts, and contract durations are adjusted as parameters based on real-time device performance, availability, and security assessments, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If devices continuously monitor and negotiate for resources, then resource sharing efficiency is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource sharing efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous monitoring, the system employs periodic resource negotiation protocols that activate at specific intervals or triggered by events such as resource availability changes or device needs. This periodic action maintains resource sharing efficiency while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Devices autonomously manage their own resource negotiation processes without requiring constant external intervention. The system enables self-service by allowing devices to independently assess their needs, evaluate available resources, and execute negotiations autonomously, reducing the energy burden on centralized management systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If a ranking system is implemented to select responding devices, then resource allocation optimality is improved, but negotiation protocol complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation optimalityVSAvoidnegotiation protocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ranking system utilizes configurable parameters such as device reliability scores, resource availability levels, and connection quality metrics. These parameters can be dynamically adjusted to prioritize different aspects of resource allocation optimality, allowing the system to achieve optimal resource distribution without requiring overly complex negotiation protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The negotiation protocol incorporates feedback mechanisms where devices provide information about their resource capabilities and reliability, and requesting devices receive feedback about available resources. This feedback loop enables optimal resource allocation decisions while keeping the protocol structure relatively simple through iterative information exchange

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250039179A1Single to multiple device resource negotiation
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20250039179A1 patent drawing
  • US20250039179A1 patent drawing
  • US20250039179A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for single to multiple device resource negotiation are provided. In some embodiments, a method of operating a requesting computing node to orchestrate execution of a peer-to-peer negotiation protocol to gain access, for a requested time period, to resources that are physically located on a remote computing node includes: sending one or more requests, to one or more remote computing nodes, for access to resources that are physically located on the remote computing nodes; receiving, from the remote computing nodes, one or more responses for access to resources that are physically located on the remote computing nodes; and selecting a subset of the responses for access to accept. Some advantages of the embodiments include enabling opportunistic increase in functionality of one physical device (requesting device) by borrowing resources that are locally unavailable, but available for use from another physical device (responding device) within a trusted device group.